Labels

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

General Delegation of the P.L.O. to the United States: Land Day for Palestine

March 30th 2011

On March 30th 1976, Palestinians that remained in the newly founded state of Israel after 1948, revolted against Israeli discriminatory policies. Six Palestinians were shot dead and dozens wounded. Today, Palestinians all over the world commemorate “Land Day” to sending a clear message to the Israeli government that our bond to the land of our ancestors is unbreakable. This year, Land Day coincides with the approval by the Israeli Knesset of new discriminatory laws against the Palestinian citizens of Israel. These new laws add are compounded by similar laws that have gone into effect over the years which went unnoticed by “advocates" of democracy and human rights here in Washington. One of these recently approved laws bans Palestinians from celebrating national occasions and threatens to deny Palestinians their government privileges if they do not show allegiance to the state’s religious and cultural character, violating basic human and civil rights.

This year's Land Day should be an occasion for all Palestinians to show unity and to end their divisions. Recognizing new changes in the Middle East, there is an urgent need for the Palestinian people to rise to the challenge of uniting their ranks and confront Israeli government policies. There is no better answer to Israel's attempts to undermine our existence in Palestine but through forging a united front. The quest for Palestinian self-determination and independence must be a guiding light for all Palestinians, in Palestine and the Diaspora. It is time that we bury our differences and focus on the threat posed by shameful Israeli policy.

The General Delegation of the PLO to the United States salutes the struggle of our brethren inside Israel who are fighting for equality and dignity. We also salute the struggle of our people in the Occupied Territories, particularly in East Jerusalem, who are standing up to the Israel occupation. Finally, we salute our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip who are under siege by an inhumane occupation which prevents food and supplies from reaching them. Let this year's Land Day be the beginning of the end of all divisions and the beginning of a united Palestinian campaign to establish our independent state with Jerusalem as its capital and a just and agreed resolution to the fate of Palestinian refugees based on UNGA resolution 194.

BDS Flash Mob in Grand Central Station, NYC

LAND DAY March 30 PALESTINE

LIFE MAGAZINE: DEIR EL-BALAH REFUGEE CAMP, GAZA STRIP - MARCH 31: Palestinian school children plant olive trees in land near the Israeli/jewish settlement of Ghosh Qateef, March 31, 2004 in the refugee camp of Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip. The olive planting took place during a protest commemorating the 28th anniversary of Land Day. Land Day marks the series of clashes between Israeli Arabs and Israeli police that erupted on March 30, 1976 when Israeli Arabs protested the Israeli government's confiscation of Arab land.

The Day of the Land
Land Day is the day when Israeli Arabs hold demonstrations to mark the loss of their land to Israel in 1948.

It is held on 30 March in commemoration of six Arabs killed by Israeli security forces in 1976 during mass protests against the farm confiscations in the Galilee.

Plans to confiscate land near the Sea of Galilee were announced in 1976
BBC Remembering Land Day


A view of Arraba from the road leading to its northern limit


Fellahat from Battir taking produce to market (1910)

“Compared to the large-scale land expropriations from the 1950′s and 60′s, the amount of land actually seized from Palestinians in 1976 was relatively small.” Rabinowitz & Baker, Coffins on Our Shoulders

Land Day - Palestine



Land Day Remembered
Date posted: March 30, 2011
By MIFTAH

Thirty-five years ago, six Palestinians from the Galilee in what is now northern Israel lost their lives in a bid to protect their land from confiscation. Today, Palestinians everywhere commemorate what has come to be known as Land Day.

Since that day, March 30, 1976, thousands of other Palestinians have lost their lives defending the same cause. At the time, Israeli authorities seized and expropriated 5,500 acres of land from Palestinian villages in the Galilee to expand Jewish settlements in the area. Residents of the villages organized a general strike and peaceful demonstrations in protest of the expropriations and the ongoing confiscation and settlement of Palestinian land.

Israeli authorities, wanting to quell any sign of nationalism and resistance, cracked down hard on the protesters, shooting and killing six men. Nearly 100 others were injured and over 300 people arrested that day.

Land Day has since been marked as a day of remembrance for those who were killed and also a day of protest against Israel’s ongoing policy of Palestinian land expropriation. Land Day also marks the first time Palestinians who remained inside the Green Line after Israel was established rose up in unison against Israel’s expansionist policies.

Today, Palestinians continue to fight for their land despite international calls for a settlement to the conflict and the establishment of a Palestinian state. With the separation wall in the West Bank continuing to grow and taking huge chunks of occupied Palestinian land with it, Palestinians everywhere are acutely aware that the events which set Land Day into motion are still in play today. Still, we remember the fallen and all those before and after them who vowed to defend Palestine and we renew that vow with each anniversary.

Viewpoint: The Grass is Not Always Greener on the Other Side by Harriet Straughen for MIFTAH


The Grass is Not Always Greener on the Other Side

Date posted: 30/03/2011

By: Harriet Straughen for MIFTAH

The other day I was checking through the morning headlines and came across a particular story that both saddened and disturbed me. A young girl of 12 had been walking through the sun, on her way to pray with her friends. As had become routine for the people in her village, she and her friends had to walk past an army patrol set up by the occupying forces. Nearby her father was cutting the grass and tidying up. Moments later, he heard shots ringing out. As he ran round the corner, the soldiers at the checkpoint had shouted abuse, jibing: “What do you think you are doing? You're only the grass-cutter.” At the tragic scene, he found his daughter dying on the ground having been shot twice in the back.

In the trial that followed, the soldier who pulled the trigger was eventually acquitted due to his story that he had been reacting to a sniper attack. There was no independent evidence to support this.

The little girl who died was Majella O’Hare and the year was 1976. The story comes from Northern Ireland and the soldier who shot her was a young British private. It is only now, 35 years later, that the British government has issued an apology to her mother.

An uncomfortable realization occurred after reading this story. Even though I was aware of the history of the Northern Ireland conflict and the unacceptable behavior of the British military during their occupation of the area, it had never really penetrated my consciousness. Such was my ignorance that up until now I had been unaware that the British had established checkpoints in Northern Ireland. It is perhaps significant that I read this story while in the West Bank. The similarities between the two situations and the connection that I made may never have occurred to me had I not been witness to the other side of the conflict. While British, and particularly English, history tells the story from the perspective of the occupier, here I am privy to the life of the occupied.

It is a tough pill to swallow to acknowledge that those in my parents’ generation may have felt similarly towards Northern Ireland and the threat of “terrorism” as many Israelis feel towards Palestinians today. My mother and father lived in London at the time of the IRA bombs and I’m sure it is safe to say that the majority of the British public felt it was justifiable and even necessary to maintain a military presence in Northern Ireland without really knowing what that meant for the civilians.

This has got me to think about how the British people, particularly the older generations, feel towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is not hard to imagine that those who witnessed armed attacks by the IRA and who, at the time, were concerned for their safety and security, may feel somewhat sympathetic to the Israeli point of view. After all, many in Britain have only been on the occupier side of the fence. As with all people, you are more likely to understand and agree with something to which you can relate.

From what I can tell, the general British public was not, and is not, aware of the full horror of occupation in Northern Ireland and, in the same token, Palestine. It is only through shocking stories such as that of Majella O’Hare that people are awoken to what is really going on ‘on the other side’ of the fence. It is Majella’s story that, for the first time, has brought the reality of the Northern Irish conflict home to me.

Through this uncomfortable realization, the determination to ensure such stories are told is intensified. As more and more people become aware of the terrible and often tragic circumstances that arise from military occupation, the more likely they are to see it from all sides, not just the one they personally relate to. It is not only about Northern Ireland or Palestine but about children and innocent civilians suffering for the ‘security’ of a powerful nation. Whether it is Majella’s story from over 30 years ago, or the equally disturbing stories coming out of Palestine today, it is only through information and understanding that people can start to change perceptions and begin to influence those who make the decisions and put an end to such tragedy.

Harriet Straughen is a Writer for the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.

Monday, March 28, 2011

CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation

CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation is an international alliance of members and partners which constitute an influential network of organisations at the local, national, regional and international levels, and span the spectrum of civil society including: civil society networks and organisations; trade unions; faith-based networks; professional associations; NGO capacity development organisations; philanthropic foundations and other funding bodies; businesses; and social responsibility programmes. CIVICUS has worked for over a decade to strengthen citizen action and civil society throughout the world, especially in areas where participatory democracy and citizens' freedom of association are threatened. CIVICUS has a vision of a global community of active, engaged citizens committed to the creation of a more just and equitable world. This is premised on the belief that the health of societies exists in direct proportion to the degree of balance between the state, the private sector and civil society. CIVICUS provides a focal point for knowledge-sharing, common interest representation, global institution-building and engagement among these disparate sectors. It acts as an advocate for citizen participation as an essential component of governance and democracy worldwide. CIVICUS seeks to amplify the voices and opinions of ordinary people and it gives expression to the enormous creative energy of the burgeoning sector of civil society.

Mission:
CIVICUS is an international alliance dedicated to strengthening citizen action and civil society throughout the world.

Vision:
A worldwide community of informed, inspired, committed citizens engaged in confronting the challenges facing humanity.

CIVICUS seeks to amplify the voices and opinions of ordinary people. It recognizes that for effective and sustainable civic participation to occur, citizens must enjoy rights of free association and be able to engage all sectors of society.

Values:

  • Justice and Equality - CIVICUS believes in the equality and dignity of every person, and that all people should be free to exercise their rights as citizens as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  • Reciprocity - CIVICUS exists to ensure that people treat one another with the respect with which they themselves wish to be treated. Civil society cannot thrive without mutual respect.
  • Knowledge - CIVICUS recognises that to increase its global awareness of civil society and before it can assist or take action, it needs to form alliances with other concerned bodies to increase its influence and knowledge.
  • Vision - CIVICUS is realistic about conflict in today's world, but remains optimistic that most people, organisations, governments and businesses will work together for the benefit of all.
  • Principled Courage - CIVICUS will always promote civil justice and pledges to act in a manner that honours the principles of democratic civil society.

Objectives:
The three main objectives that inform our mission are:

  • Civic Existence - to promote the rights of citizens to organise and act collectively towards defined goals for the public good.
  • Civic Expression - to increase the effectiveness and improve the governance of civil society organisations, as well as their capacity to set and achieve their individual and collective goals.
  • Civic Engagement - Engagement - to foster interaction between civil society and other institutions in order to increase the voice of citizens in public life.

Staff Members

Board of Directors

Time to Make the Promise of Equality a Reality

http://www.everyhumanhasrights.org/human-rights-news/189-international-womens-day-2011-time-to-make-the-promise-of-equality-a-reality
International Women's Day, 2011: Time to Make the Promise of Equality a Reality
Message by Michelle Bachelet, Executive Director, UN Women

A hundred years ago today, women across the world took an historic step on the long road to equality. The first ever International Women’s Day was called to draw attention to the unacceptable and often dangerous working conditions that so many women faced worldwide. Although the occasion was celebrated in only a handful of countries, it brought over one million women out onto the streets, demanding not just better conditions at work but also the right to vote, to hold office and to be equal partners with men.

I suspect those courageous pioneers would look at our world today with a mixture of pride and disappointment. There has been remarkable progress as the last century has seen an unprecedented expansion of women’s legal rights and entitlements. Indeed, the advancement of women’s rights can lay claim to be one of the most profound social revolutions the world has seen.

One hundred years ago, only two countries allowed women to vote. Today, that right is virtually universal and women have now been elected to lead Governments in every continent. Women, too, hold leading positions in professions from which they were once banned. Far more recently than a century ago, the police, courts and neighbors still saw violence in the home as a purely private matter. Today two-thirds of countries have specific laws that penalise domestic violence and the United Nations Security Council now recognises sexual violence as a deliberate tactic of war.

But despite this progress over the last century, the hopes of equality expressed on that first International Women’s Day are a long way from being realised. Almost two out of three illiterate adults are women. Girls are still less likely to be in school than boys. Every 90 seconds of every day, a woman dies in pregnancy or due to childbirth-related complications despite us having the knowledge and resources to make birth safe.

Across the world, women continue to earn less than men for the same work. In many countries, too, they have unequal access to land and inheritance rights. And despite high-profile advances, women still make up only 19 per cent of legislatures, 8% of peace negotiators, and only 28 women are heads of state or government.

It is not just women who pay the price for this discrimination. We all suffer for failing to make the most of half the world’s talent and potential. We undermine the quality of our democracy, the strength of our economies, the health of our societies and the sustainability of peace. This year’s focus of International Women’s Day on women’s equal access to education, training, science and technology underscores the need to tap this potential.

The agenda to secure gender equality and women’s rights is a global agenda, a challenge for every country, rich and poor, north and south. It was in recognition of both its universality and the rewards if we get this right that the United Nations brought together four existing organizations to create UN Women. The goal of this new body, which I have the great privilege to lead, is to galvanize the entire UN system so we can deliver on the promise of the UN Charter of equal rights of men and women. It is something I have fought for my whole life.

As a young mother and a pediatrician, I experienced the struggles of balancing family and career and saw how the absence of child care prevented women from paid employment. The opportunity to help remove these barriers was one of the reasons I went into politics. It is why I supported policies that extended health and childcare services to families and prioritized public spending for social protection.

As President, I worked hard to create equal opportunities for both men and women to contribute their talents and experiences to the challenges facing our country. That is why I proposed a Cabinet that had an equal number of men and women.

As Executive Director of UN Women, I want to use my journey and the collective knowledge and experience all around me to encourage progress towards true gender equality across the world. We will work, in close partnership, with men and women, leaders and citizens, civil society, the private sector and the whole UN system to assist countries to roll out policies, programs and budgets to achieve this worthy goal.

I have seen myself what women, often in the toughest circumstances, can achieve for their families and societies if they are given the opportunity. The strength, industry and wisdom of women remain humanity’s greatest untapped resource. We simply cannot afford to wait another 100 years to unlock this potential.

* About the author: Michelle Bachelet is the first Executive Director of UN Women, a newly formed UN organization dedicated to gender equality and the empowerment of women. She is the former President of Chile.


EVERY HUMAN HAS RIGHTS

My Letter to the Washington Post RE In Obama’s push for Mideast peace, whose side is he on? by Jackson Diehl

RE: In Obama’s push for Mideast peace, whose side is he on? by Jackson Diehl
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-obamas-push-for-mideast-peace-whose-side-is-he-on/2011/03/24/AFdkaikB_story.html

Dear Editor,

In glancing at the Mideast and peace- whose side is the Washington Post's
Deputy Editorial Page Editor Jackson Diehl on? Certainly not America's... and certainly not on the side of full disclosure when it comes to his pet project Israel. Reading Diehl's columns it is impossible to see even a glimpse of the well known fact that Israel has been investing in institutionalized bigotry and injustice for decades- and harshly oppressing and punishing the Palestinians because they dare object.

One example out of many: Israel has been persistently expanding an "Israeli-only road network in the West Bank to ease travel for [Jewish] settlers, while continuing to restrict Palestinian movement with checkpoints, roadblocks, earthmounds, earth walls, road gates, road barriers and trenches"
Israel bulldozes Fayyad's Freedom Road, again

How many more Palestinian homes will Israel demolish- how many more Palestinian men, women and children will be pushed into poverty- and forced exile- while pro-Israel pundits spin America away from understanding and believing in Palestine and a secular two state solution.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab

"
Just as a reminder, the Nakba is how Palestinians refer to the period in which Israel was created. While Israeli Jews celebrate the birth of their new homeland, the Palestinians mourn the loss of their loved ones, their homes, their land and their flight into exile. Tens of thousands of Palestinians were killed and over 800,000 Palestinians fled the fighting and massacres perpetrated by Jewish gangs in the months leading up to May 15, 1948, never to return. Over 400 Palestinian villages were razed to the ground to make way for the newly arrived Jewish immigrants from Europe. Palestinians who left their homes, thinking it was a temporary alternative to being slain in their own beds, would end up in squalid refugee camps in neighboring Arab countries and in the West Bank and Gaza, never to return. Sixty-plus years later, refugees, their descendants and Palestinians still living in Israel whose original villages and homes were destroyed or usurped still commemorate that day by remembering the ongoing injustice that history has never rectified.

This seems reasonable within the freedoms provided by a “democratic state”. It also seems reasonable in light of Israel’s rampant attacks against anyone who questions the plight of Jews throughout history, namely those it likes to call “Holocaust deniers”. Surely, Israel would not want to be viewed in a light similar to those it so ardently criticizes?" Israel’s Bent Neck...by Joharah Baker for MIFTAH


The Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you


Israel’s Bent Neck...by Joharah Baker for MIFTAH

Israel’s Bent Neck

Date posted: 28/03/2011

By: Joharah Baker for MIFTAH

In Arabic, we have a very expressive saying that goes like this: “The camel never sees the bend of his own neck.” We use it when referring to someone who points out the faults of others when they have the very own fault. As one could imagine, this saying is used in abundance and not only in reference to individuals but to whole states.

While we have all been guilty of this shortcoming at some time or another, in this instance the “camel” is Israel. Last week, Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, passed the “Nakba Law” which ultimately punishes anyone in Israel who holds events on the country’s “Independence Day” as a day of catastrophe (Nakba) or mourning. Anyone who holds these types of events – in this case, Palestinians living inside Israel, can be made to pay exorbitant fines. The law also applies to any activity that “denies that Israel is a Jewish state as well as the country’s democratic character” or which supports armed struggle against Israel.

Just as a reminder, the Nakba is how Palestinians refer to the period in which Israel was created. While Israeli Jews celebrate the birth of their new homeland, the Palestinians mourn the loss of their loved ones, their homes, their land and their flight into exile. Tens of thousands of Palestinians were killed and over 800,000 Palestinians fled the fighting and massacres perpetrated by Jewish gangs in the months leading up to May 15, 1948, never to return. Over 400 Palestinian villages were razed to the ground to make way for the newly arrived Jewish immigrants from Europe. Palestinians who left their homes, thinking it was a temporary alternative to being slain in their own beds, would end up in squalid refugee camps in neighboring Arab countries and in the West Bank and Gaza, never to return. Sixty-plus years later, refugees, their descendants and Palestinians still living in Israel whose original villages and homes were destroyed or usurped still commemorate that day by remembering the ongoing injustice that history has never rectified.

This seems reasonable within the freedoms provided by a “democratic state”. It also seems reasonable in light of Israel’s rampant attacks against anyone who questions the plight of Jews throughout history, namely those it likes to call “Holocaust deniers”. Surely, Israel would not want to be viewed in a light similar to those it so ardently criticizes?

Still, here we are. Israel has just passed a law that denies an entire people’s history. The Nakba has been stricken from textbooks offered to Palestinians inside Israel because, according to one Israeli official, “No state could be expected to portray its own foundation as a catastrophe.”

It is ridiculous to deny that horrible things happened to the Jews in Nazi Germany. There are hard facts that prove these atrocities really occurred. Besides, if it were not for the recognition of the Holocaust, there would be no compensation or justice for its victims.

The same should be applied to Palestinians. A great injustice was done to them in 1948, one which has never been recognized by Israel or rectified in any way. Remembering the disaster of 1948, the suffering it caused and the ongoing pain it still inflicts on all Palestinians in varying degrees is a way of honoring those who lost their lives and their homes. It is also a way of reminding the world that there is a gaping hole in the so-called democracy of Israel; that this country would love to erase the Palestinian narrative of 1948 and replace it with the sole Israeli Zionist narrative of Israel’s creation.

Israel should have learned by now how wrong it is to deny a people’s history. It is no more right to deny the Palestinians’ narrative of what happened in 1948 than it is to deny that millions of Jews perished in WWII. There is ample evidence that the Holocaust occurred. Let us not allow Israel to deny a catastrophe it created with its own hands. The evidence is right under our noses.

Joharah Baker is Director of the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.

The Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy

VISION

An independent, democratic and sovereign Palestinian state, which grants Palestinians their basic rights, preserves their dignity, and enjoys international recognition and respect.


Israel bulldozes Fayyad's Freedom Road, again

http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=371931
Israel bulldozes Fayyad's Freedom Road, again
SALFIT (Ma'an) -- Israeli authorities bulldozed "Freedom Road" in the northern West Bank district of Salfit for the second time on Thursday.

Freedom Road was funded by the Palestinian Authority, and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. The project was part of Prime Minister Salam Fayyad's plan to build institutions and infrastructure for a future Palestinian state.

The road allowed Palestinian families to access their homes, schools, land and health clinics.

Fayyad inaugurated the road in September 2010, but Israel's military destroyed it in November, while the prime minister was abroad.

Under Fayyad's supervision the municipality rebuilt the road, but Israeli bulldozers arrived in the area Thursday and destroyed it again.

The village mayor Abdul Kareem Rayan said Israeli forces kept residents away from the area and attacked locals who tried to defend the road, which provided a lifeline to villagers.

Rayan appealed to Fayyad and to international human rights organizations to intervene in Israel's aggression against Palestinians and their land.

The road was located in Area C. Under the Oslo Accords, Area C makes up 60 percent of the West Bank. It is under full Israeli military control, although the PA is still responsible for providing services in the area.

UN: Israel's road system in West Bank "apartheid"

In his report to the UN General Assembly in January, UN Special Rapporteur for human rights Richard Falk said Israel's segregation of roads in Area C violated international law, which prohibits apartheid.

"The dual system of roads, as correlated with legal regimes, creates two domains in the West Bank: one for privileged Israeli settlers and the other for subjugated Palestinians living under an occupation," Falk's report found.

Falk noted that roads being constructed or upgraded in Area C remained under Israel's control and "largely inaccessible to Palestinians."

Israel was expanding its Israeli-only road network in the West Bank to ease travel for settlers, while continuing to restrict Palestinian movement with checkpoints, roadblocks, earthmounds, earth walls, road gates, road barriers and trenches, Falk added.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Hanan Ashrawi: "We deserve our freedom, we deserve our state"

'We deserve our freedom, we deserve our state

Sunday, March 27, 2011
Lauren Zumbach
SPECIAL TO THE TIMES

PLO spokeswoman Hanan Ashrawi warned recently that failure to reach a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict could "destroy the chance for peace everywhere."

Speaking Tuesday to students and faculty at Princeton University's McCosh Hall, Ashrawi argued that Arab regimes have used Palestine's occupation as an excuse to focus on militarization at the expense of development, suppressing democratic forces throughout the region.

"In the absence of any solution it is not just the Palestinians who will suffer, Israel will suffer as well," Ashrawi said. "If the official Israeli policy of biding time continues, they are sacrificing the strategic objective of peace for narrow short-term gains and doing the Israeli people great injustice," she said....READ MORE

Aramex and UNRWA inaugurate a library in Nahr el-Bared camp


Aramex and UNRWA inaugurate a library in Nahr el-Bared camp

Beirut
25 March 2011

Logistics and transportation company Aramex and UNRWA inaugurated a public library in the Nahr el-Bared refugee camp in north Lebanon today, in the presence of the Regional Manager of Aramex in Lebanon and West Africa, Mrs Asma Zein, and the Deputy Director of UNRWA Affairs in Lebanon, Mr Robert Hurt.

Thanks to the US$ 32,500 contribution from Aramex, which covers the running costs and equipment of the library, the inhabitants of Nahr el-Bared camp will have the opportunity to read books from all over the world. Aramex will also donate books for the library for an estimated value of US$ 10,000.

Thanking Aramex for its donation, Hurt said: “It gives me great pleasure to be part of this inauguration ceremony today. I know that there is an Arabic saying that describes books as being the best companion of a person. This l`ibrary will give people – young and old – the opportunity to be in good company, to learn and exercise their minds and imagination. It is a wonderful symbol of Aramex and UNRWA’s partnership – a partnership that grows stronger every day.”

The destruction of Nahr el-Bared camp in the conflict of 2007, and the subsequent displacement of some 27,000 Palestine refugees from the camp and its adjacent areas created a humanitarian crisis, the effects of which are still being felt four years on. Thanks to donor contributions since 2007, UNRWA has been able to meet the most basic needs of the displaced refugees. The physical reconstruction of the camp began in November 2009, and construction is under way for two packages out of eight, and three of six UNRWA schools. Nevertheless, the long-term recovery of the camp and its residents is by no means assured, and UNRWA’s support to the displaced refugees continues to be vital.

----- End ----

For further information please contact:
Hoda Samra
UNRWA Public information officer in Lebanon
+961-70-010129
Fax: +961-1-840468
h.samra@unrwa.org

Economist: Exile for a bookseller

"...Is it Mr Fahmi's role in keeping the debate about the conflict alive that has annoyed the Israeli authorities? Perhaps; but more likely, he is just another of what are thought to be thousands of Palestinian-born repatriates whom Israel kept in legal limbo by letting them stay as tourists but is now forcing out as part of its attempt to maintain the demographic upper hand of Jews over Arabs. Legally, it is within the country's rights to do so. But Mr Fahmi's case does it no favours on the public-relations front (an international petition in support of his right to live in East Jerusalem is making the rounds). It merely highlights the injustice of a system that allows members of one tribe to return after 2,000 years, but forbids members of another, even if they were born there, to come home after two decades"

Munther Fahmi

Exile for a bookseller