Saturday, April 10, 2010
What if America
Tribes and no medicine
beyond herbs... no property laws here
no libraries no train stations
No Duke Ellington
& no Revolution...
No Bill of Rights
No Ellis Island
No Kitty Hawk
No Nuremberg Trial
& No Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Imagine then Nazi Germany in power
easily pushing all of Europe's Jews
into concentration camps-
Arabs and Muslims
would have no escape
and no excuses...
no Hollywood to curse
no Martin Luther King to quote...
no audience beyond their own
April 10, 2010 - 10:05am
A few days ago a David Ignatius column in the Washington Post introduced a new Obama administration concept in the standoff with PM Netanyahu: the idea that the United States might develop and begin promoting its own specified plan for a Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. In effect, this plays on Israel's deep concern about a settlement that is "imposed" by outside powers rather than one that is negotiated with the Palestinians. They fear this would deprive them of the leverage that comes from the asymmetry of power between the occupier and the occupied, and mean in effect negotiating with the United States rather than the Palestinians and suddenly being the weaker party in a new asymmetry of power. Ignatius accurately recounted that in the most recent of a series of meetings National Security Advisor James Jones has been holding with six of his predecessors, Pres. Obama dropped by for 10 minutes and asked directly about the prospects of such a move. Apparently first Brent Scowcroft and then Zbigniew Brzezinski strongly endorsed the idea, followed by others, and no one objected. The President apparently did not either welcome or dismiss this response, but listened and left. Ignatius quoted two unnamed senior administration officials endorsing the idea, creating the impression that this is a real and imminent possibility.
I think it's impossible to read this as, at this stage at least, anything other than a trial balloon largely designed to pressure Netanyahu and his colleagues. Translated into English, the rhetoric first floated in the Ignatius column says to Bibi: "we haven't heard back from you since the Shepherd Hotel fiasco and the insult to the President, and you have to come up with something quickly. The special relationship does not give you license to push us around, and you need to know we are going to be the winners in this confrontation. We are not going to accept a stalemate, and if you don't come up with something acceptable, you're going to force us to begin to move in this direction eventually. We have options. Don't make us use them." One should quickly point out that anyone rejoicing that the United States is seriously considering drafting its own peace plan and then trying to impose it on the parties should drink a big glass of water and breathe deeply. No doubt it's true that there are many people in the foreign policy establishment who think it would be a good idea, and a faction within the administration that is pushing for it, obviously led by Gen. Jones. However, for many reasons it's also obvious that the administration is quite a long way off from doing this, if it ever would.
At some point the United States will clearly have to fight with both Israel and the Palestinians, and possibly the Arab states as well, over substantive issues in order to midwife a workable negotiated peace agreement. This might involve a comprehensive American plan rather than bridging proposals. But for this to be productive, the fight needs to come at a time when it has a real chance of producing serious diplomatic benefits. It's important to understand that this administration wasn't looking for a fight with Israel now. Netanyahu, and much more specifically whoever decided to announce the Ramat Shlomo settlement expansion during the Biden visit and then the Shepherd Hotel expansion on the same day as Netanyahu's visit to the White House, have forced the issue in a reckless and bizarre manner. The administration is rightly determined not to be seen as backing down, and not to take these slights and defiance with equanimity. But the administration's goal is to get the two parties back into talks, with the hope that negotiations will begin to produce their own dynamic that can move away from bilateral US-Israel discussions about settlements in Jerusalem to Palestinian-Israel discussions about final status issues.The problem is, of course, it's not evident that the administration has either a clear sense of what to do once the negotiations begin, or a plan b if they continue to be frustrated by the recalcitrance of one or both of the parties. This is where the Jones-Ignatius trial balloon comes in...READ MORE
|Personality of the Month|
Taha Muhammad Ali
Taha Muhammad Ali was born in 1931 in Saffuriyya Village in the Galilee, Palestine. At the age of seventeen, in 1948, Ali was forced with his family into a year-long exile, when their village was destroyed by the Israeli army. They eventually managed to come back and settle just five kilometres away from Saffuriyya, in Nazareth, where he has lived ever since. For the next fifty years, Ali would sell souvenirs during the day to tourists from his shop in Nazareth. At night, however, he would study poetry; everything from classical Arabic to contemporary American free verse. In the 1950s Ali published his first short stories, but his poems did not begin to appear in Arabic periodicals until the 1970s.
Now perceived as a major Palestinian poet, Ali is esteemed primarily for his plainspoken and quietly sophisticated poetry. His poems mainly disclose political complexity and humanity. They concern personal memories juxtaposed with political events. In his poems Ali writes vividly of his childhood in Saffuriyya and of the political upheavals he has survived. The Saffuriyya of his youth has indeed served as the nexus of his poetry and fiction, which are grounded in everyday experience and the life of simple people.
Nevertheless, against the crushing specificity of his historical self, as poet and critic Victoria Chang notes, Ali responds with a delicately balanced generality, allowing him to explore universal themes, as when he writes of bread and water.
it has taken me
all of sixty years
that water is the finest drink,
and bread the most delicious food,
and that art is worthless
unless it plants
a measure of splendor in people’s hearts.
In another poem, titled “The Falcon,” the speaker asks why sadness would have him “collapse / like the eagle’s features,” an especially stunning image for readers more accustomed to the cliché of eagle as a symbol of national power.
Ali writes in a forceful and direct style, in short lines of varying beats, with disarming humour and an unflinching honesty. And although his style relies on structures based on classical Arabic poetry, Ali does not yield to embellishment in his diction but tends towards simple words and images. As Chang beautifully observes, “simplicity is something Muhammad Ali risks and exploits.”
Poet Gabriel Levin, in his turn, suggests that Ali’s poetry recalls in contemporary terms the work of the great modern Turkish poet, Nazim Hikmet, as well as the Central and Eastern European poetry of Ungaretti, Różewicz, and Herbert - poets who wrote with unflinching honesty as the lights dimmed in their native lands. Such poets replaced the “poeticisms” of their elders with a stark, emotional directness. Ali, according to Levin, has released a complex of emotions of startling and often unexpected force. He has described a harsh, often painful realism, emotional desolation, images of desertion and ruin, and the sudden eruption of violence, without giving in to mere folklore and nostalgia.
Muhammad Ali’s books of poetry include al-Quasida ar-Rabia (Fourth Qasida, 1983), Dhahek ala Thuqoun al-Qatalah (Fooling the Killers, 1989), and Hariq fi Maqbarat al-Dayr (Fire in the Convent Garden, 1992).
The upcoming Palestine Literature of Festival (1-6 May, http://www.palfest.org) is honouring Taha Muhammad Ali in its opening ceremony in Jerusalem on 1 May 2010. The festival’s full programme will be available from mid-April.
Friday, April 9, 2010
Poetry Out Loud: Ibtisam Barakat ابتسام ب will be one of the judges in the finals of the national poetry recitation competition for all of US schools.
Ibtisam Barakat ابتسام بركات Poetry Out Loud: Ibtisam [ Palestinian-American writer, poet, and educator- author of award winning TASTING THE SKY] will be one of the judges in the finals of the national poetry recitation competition for all of US schools. A most glorious event. More than 300 thousand students have particpated this year. Judging of the top 12 will happen on April 26 and 27 in Washington, D.C. Poetry Out Loud is a program of the National Endowment for the Arts and the Poetry Foundation. -- Ibtisam Barakat 2010.
Annie's New Letters: Celebrating some GREAT Palestinian-American Artists, Writers & Poets... March Forth! The Index
The Mossburg/LeVine plan to make Israel and Palestine into one parallel state with separate citizenship based on identity sounds like a very good way to ensure that Israel's investments in institutionalized bigotry and settlement projects can thrive.
Anne Selden Annab
"The establishment of an independent, sovereign, and viable Palestinian state is fundamental for peace, security and stability in our region. Whereas Israeli settlement policies and activities continue to undermine the viability of the two- state solution, our government is determined to preserve and advance this solution concept through our full commitment to the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) program. We call on our people to unite behind this program and the government’s vision to transform it into a reality. This is the path to freedom. This is the path to the creation of the independent state of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied in 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital. And, yes, this can and must happen within the next two years." Palestine: Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State
Thursday, April 8, 2010
My letters to the New York Times & The Washington Post RE Discussions, but no decisions, on an Obama plan for Mideast peace
RE: Weighing an Obama Plan to End a Mideast Logjam
You do your readers (and America as well as Israel) no favors by foolishly attempting to dismiss the Palestinian refugees right of return when advocating the outline of a potential peace agreement to end the Israel/Palestine conflict.
A serious and believable peace agreement has to respect international law and basic human rights.... and it has to take into account the fact that Israel has continued to evict Palestinians and usurp their land all along. A serious and believable peace agreement must not empower or excuse Israel's institutionalized bigotry, injustice and intransigence.
Anne Selden Annab
RE: Discussions, but no decisions, on an Obama plan for Mideast peace
You mainly empower HAMAS and religious tyranny by falling in line with the Zionist desire to discredit and destroy the Palestinian refugees very real right to return to original homes and lands.
Stateless Palestinian refugees need to be free to make informed choices: One by one, and family by family they need to be free to simply be people- not pawns for various religious schemes, petty tyrants and angry radicals who use the Israel/Palestine conflict as a launching pad for their hate campaigns.
A fully secular two state solution to end the contentious Israel/Palestine conflict is the most realistic and reasonable path to a just and lasting peace. By returning to original homes and lands in what is now Israel, Palestinians currently living in forced exile need to understand that they will be choosing to be citizens of Israel, whereas by accepting compensation and moving elsewhere Palestinians will actually have a chance to empower a real Palestinian state.
Anne Selden Annab
ATFP Senior Fellow Discusses Palestine and the Art of the Possible at Monmouth University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact Information: Hussein Ibish
April 7, 2010 - 12:00am
A two-state negotiated agreement between Israel and the Palestinians is the only workable formula for peace, ATFP Senior Fellow Hussein Ibish told an audience of 50 at the ninth annual global understanding conference at Monmouth University. The address on the second day of the conference, April 6, 2010, touched on a number of themes centered around the idea of the art of the possible. Ibish explained in detail his view that alternatives to a two-state solution are all fanciful because one or more of the parties in question would simply not agree to them. "The one-state agenda is a nonstarter because the overwhelming majority of Jewish Israelis will never agree to this, and undoubtedly would fight against it violently," he said. "The so-called Jordanian Option, which is a wet dream of the Israeli ultra-right, in which Egypt and Jordan are forced to take responsibility for Gaza and parts of the West Bank that Israel doesn't want respectively, is equally absurd," he continued, "because both the Palestinians and the Egyptians and Jordanians will resist this with all possible means."
He urged the audience to treat any political idea with skepticism if it could not be accepted by one or more of the parties that would have to agree in order for it to function, or if it had no serious relationship to existing political, social, military and economic forces that can actually produce real outcomes. He repeated his now trademark analogy between the relationship between such fanciful ideas and actual political concepts, and the relationship between science and science fiction. Ibish said "we need a new term in the English language like "politic-ish" or "politic-esque" to describe ideas that appear to have the attributes of political notions tied to the real world but that actually have no relationship to really existing political, social, military and economic forces that produce real outcomes." He said, "good science fiction often has many of the attributes of science writing, and sound scientific ideas incorporated in their plots, but in the end it's deliberately fanciful and people can clearly see that. However, since the political register is largely subjective and much less empirically verifiable than most scientific ideas, it's much easier for people to get away with passing off wild fantasies as serious agendas without people understanding how fanciful they are. A neologism describing how what are at heart not really political ideas pose as serious political agendas might help clarify the point."
Ibish described the present impasse between the US and Israeli governments as a political but not a strategic crisis and said that while it would be resolved soon in all likelihood, further confrontations, or at least serious disagreements, were likely because the fundamental context for the US-Israel relationships had shifted. He said that while in the past American administrations including the Bush administration had viewed strategic relations in the Middle East as discrete problems to be dealt with on bilateral or trilateral bases, the Obama administration and the foreign policy establishment in Washington generally had re-conceptualized their model of strategic relations in the Arab and Islamic world. "The new hegemonic model can be compared to a kaleidoscope," Ibish said, "in which when one piece of the puzzle shifts, the entire pattern rearranges itself." He said they had correctly identified the issue of the occupation in Palestine at the center of this kaleidoscopic pattern because of its political and symbolic importance.
Ibish said that he expected proximity talks and other negotiations to resume in the foreseeable future, but that a breakthrough in the next 12 to 16 months was unlikely given the weakness of leaderships and the enormous differences of opinion between the parties. He said because of this, the state and institution building program of the Palestinian Authority is particularly crucial because it can provide momentum towards peace even when diplomacy appears to be stalled or moving too slowly. Ibish said the program calls the bluff of all parties, forcing them to reveal whether or not they were ever really committed to the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, because the program is a necessary step in that direction. "It calls the bluff of Palestinians because it asks them to channel most of their energies in this constructive, positive direction," he said, "and it calls the bluff of the Israelis because as this program develops it will be necessary for them to cede more and more of the attributes of sovereignty in greater and greater parts of the West Bank to the PA or kill the program and admit to themselves and others that they were never really in favor of the state of Palestine at all." He urged the audience to educate themselves about the program, to spread the word, to talk to members of Congress about the importance of supporting it, and to promote the idea of investing in Palestine.
Blogger visits ATFP office
Fares bemoaned the fact that "the Palestinian national movement, as opposed to Islam, has no media, no message, no vision. Our TV channel shows people singing and dancing." He was disgusted with his colleagues at an academic conference in Lebanon from which he had just returned: "I was the only one who spoke about a two-state solution. The rest of them said it may take fifty or sixty years, but Israel will end. I think we have maybe two years left to save the principle of two states." Fares was disdainful of the PA president: "In the five years and two months since his election, Abu Mazen has had no major achievements. When there's a power vacuum, the only thing to fill it will be Islam. That will be a catastrophe."
Fares used his only positive adjective twice when speaking of Fayyad. "His message is good and his vision for creating a Palestinian state is good. But it won't work if Israel won't allow him to do anything in Area C--not even to put up street signs or agricultural buildings." If the Palestinian state fails, said Fares, the only alternative will be the extreme religious groups, "who are in a hurry to be in paradise." "
A Visit With Salam Fayyad
Hussein Ibish on Fayyad "A Palestinian state is not going to be theoretical or academic forever. People need to see it's really happening."
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
While this is not a new practice - settlers have used documents from British Mandate times as well - it would be good that this practice either be understood for what it is or be ended.
In Jerusalem they say that these documents are forged. This, of course, would be no great surprise, since settlers can’t stoop too low in their project to clear Palestine of its indigenous population. The Israeli courts are biased in favour of the settlers, but there’s no surprise there either. For a country that prides itself on its democracy and rule of law, Israel’s legal system remains fundamentally skewed against Palestinians.
There is, for instance, the Law of Absentee Property, a piece of legislation that was brought in 1950 for the express purpose of legitimising the appropriation - read theft - of Palestinian property left unguarded when some 800,000 people fled or were forced to flee in 1947-48.
Of course, the law targets Palestinians without saying so explicitly, a time-honoured Israeli practice. It does not mention Arabs or Palestinians and their properties. It talks only about landlords who fled to enemy territory, i.e., the entire surrounding Arab neighbourhood and the only place to which Palestinians could flee. Their properties subsequently became the property of the state of Israel in what is quite possibly the largest case of real estate theft in history.
Palestinians quite rightly demand this outrageous wrong be righted. They demand that their properties be restored to them and they be granted the right, if they so choose, to return to them. This is a right enshrined in international law. The whole world may have given up on this, but that is only because the international community has slowly but surely given up on human rights.
Of course, nothing annoys an Israeli more than the Palestinians’ right of return. So palpable is this annoyance that it is clear that it agitates the conscience.
If the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is about just one thing, as Israelis know deep down, it is 1948 and the wholesale dispossession of an entire nation.
For the Israeli legal system to allow the contrary, i.e., the restitution of property pre-1948 or 1967 in occupied territory to Jewish owners (when such claims have a basis in reality) is therefore a fantastic provocation that will only incite greater anger and more violence.
It is also clear testament to the racist nature of the Israeli legal system.
There is a great opportunity in the next few months to reach a just peace between Israelis and Palestinians. This may seem a surprising view just now, but there is a competent and responsible Palestinian government in place which is serious about establishing a sovereign Palestinian state alongside Israel. And there is strong public support for this objective. The evidence is all around you if you come to see the reality.
It would be tragic if Israel were to miss this opportunity -- tragic for Israel as well as for Palestinians. It is profoundly mysterious to us as to why the current Israeli government seems unable to envision how the Palestinian state which we are building is the best way of ensuring a lasting peace. Not to mention righting the many injustices of its long and costly occupation.
Yet instead, the Israeli government seems determined to ignore the positive reality and hark back to previous times. Take for example Israeli accusations of Palestinian 'incitement.' Incitement is a very elastic concept and hard to define. If it means putting incitement propaganda into schools, the Palestinian National Authority has already made successful efforts to deal with this...READ MORE
Winnipeg churches welcome Palestinian refugee family
By Renée Joette Friesen | Tuesday, March 30, 2010
WINNIPEG, MB—Fatema Abdulraheem sets the table in her tiny, modest apartment that she shares with two adult sons. She puts out a spread of fried chicken on a bed of rice, finely cut potatoes and peas, accompanied by homemade naan bread and sour cream.
The Palestinian woman explains through a translator that the sour cream is not the proper traditional accompaniment. She meant to buy yoghurt, but the packaging was so similar she couldn't tell the difference between the two dairy products. On another occasion, she bought cottage cheese by mistake, she says with a laugh.
The problems Fatema encounters at the grocery store are just some of challenges she and her family face on a daily basis as newcomers to Canada.
"Language is huge; it's the biggest hurdle. Stores and shopping malls can be overwhelming at times," says Heather Rochon, a volunteer with Hospitality House, a refugee ministry that has helped Fatema's family adapt to their new country since they left a refugee camp near Syria last fall.
Rochon explains that refugees often have to be fiercely independent and survive horrific circumstances before coming to Canada. When they finally arrive, they experience the opposite and must rely completely on others because of language and cultural barriers. "Just being so dependent on other people is very hard on them. It's a total culture shock."
But having sponsors to help them is making the transition a bit easier for Fatema and her family.
Three Manitoba faith-based groups banded together to bring Fatema's family of 14 refugees to Winnipeg. They responded to an opportunity the Canadian government presented to private sponsors when it agreed to assist Palestinians trapped in refugee camps on the border between Syria and Iraq.
The Fort Garry Mennonite Fellowship, the Anglican Diocese of Rupert's Land and Aberdeen Evangelical Mennonite Church each agreed to privately sponsor different members of Fatema's extended family for one year.
"Canada asked if people would take it on as privately sponsored cases," says Tom Denton of the Anglican Diocese, which is hosting Fatema and her two sons.
"We are responding to a human need," says Herb Heppner of Aberdeen EMC, which is sponsoring another of Fatema's relatives and her small children. He adds that the two church congregations and the Anglican Diocese each committed between $25,000 and $30,000 to cover all expenses for the one-year sponsorship.
Fatema, her two sons, Ahmed and Kaheder Abu-Khrait, arrived in Canada last fall. Another of her sons, his wife and four small children, along with a sister to the wife and her three children had come to Canada shortly before.
Back in 2006, Fatema's entire family lived in the same house in Iraq. But after Saddam Hussein fell from power, Iraq excommunicated Palestinians. Fatema says an Iraqi came to her house and killed another of her sons who was just 27 at the time.
A month later, Fatema and Ahmed fled to the refugee camp where they were reunited with other family members. They endured strict food rations, poor water and sub-standard shelter for four years before coming to Canada.
"We will be grateful all our lives to our sponsors and to Canada," Fatema says.
"We were so happy when we reached Canada," says Kaheder of the "freedom and safety" they now enjoy. "No one asks you for identification here."
Fatema and her family moved to Winnipeg at different times last fall, and they now live in relatively close proximity to one another in the city's south end.
"We decided to do that so that the family can be a support to each other," Heppner explains.
"We felt as a congregation this [sponsorship] was something we wanted to be involved in," says Deborah Martin-Koop, a member of Fort Garry Mennonite Fellowship who serves on the Welcoming Committee.
"We're very aware this is not a panacea. It is not the only answer. But this is a small conference and we can make a difference for a number of people," Martin-Koop says of the family of six they are hosting.
"They are a wonderful family to work with," Rochon says. "They seem very happy and motivated to settle."
The first priority for all members of Fatema's family has been to learn English.
Her sons are eager to find jobs once they have a handle on the language. Kaheder worked in construction and Ahmed was an electrician before the war in Iraq began.
While much of the family is fortunate to now be together, some of Fatema's other children are still separated—two of her sons are in the U.S. and she has three daughters in Baghdad.
"In Iraq we were surrounded by our family. At Ramadan we were all together. I wish we could bring them all here," says Ahmed.
|Date posted: April 03, 2010 |
This week marks both Easter and the Jewish holiday of Passover. On these two occasions, thousands of Christian and Jewish worshippers from around the world flocked to Jerusalem to observe the holidays along with an approximate 2,500 Israeli military personnel patrolling the streets. One group that was clearly absent, however, were Palestinian Christians, many of whom were not allowed into the holy city. On March 28, Israeli authorities imposed a closure on the West Bank for a period of eight days, or the entire Passover period. Christian Palestinians, who usually are granted permits into Jerusalem for Easter, were reported to have been turned back at checkpoints when trying to enter.
On March 28, a group of Palestinian Christians and Muslims along with international and Israeli peace activists joined in a march demanding freedom of movement for the Palestinians. The march, which took place in Bethlehem, made its way to an army checkpoint on Palm Sunday but were stopped and some arrested by Israeli soldiers after crossing over. While Israel released the foreign and Israeli participants, it held the Palestinians, including Fateh Central Council member Abbas Zaki in custody for four days, charging them with entering a closed military zone.
Furthermore, throughout this week, Israel has limited the entry of Palestinians into the Aqsa Mosque, allowing only men above 50 entry into the mosque.
Also on April 2 in Ramallah, Jewish settlers attacked an elderly Palestinian and her daughter in Sheikh Jarrah during a protest against settler "provocations" in the neighborhood. The elderly woman, 89-year-old Rifqa Al-Kurd was taken to Al-Maqassed Hospital along with her daughter, 50-year-old Nadiya.
On April 1, Israeli settlers and soldiers attacked Palestinians in the east Jerusalem district of Silwan. According to eyewitnesses, settlers broke into the local Ibda and Wad Helwa cultural centers in the neighborhood. Fifteen-year-old Yezen Siam was arrested by Israeli soldiers and taken to an undisclosed location. Several others were injured in the attack.
In the West Bank, 21-year-old Samar Radwan was killed when an Israeli settler hit her with his car west of Ramallah. Radwan was killed near Al-Lubban Al-Gharbi, between Israel's separation wall and the settlements of Ofarim and Bet Arye.
Unrest was not only in Jerusalem, however, but also in the Gaza Strip, spilling over from the clashes last week. On April 2, Israeli warplanes fired attacks across the Strip, destroying several buildings. The attacks, said Israel, were in response to Palestinian rockets fired into Israeli territory. According to Palestinian press reports, Israeli missiles hit a building housing the Hamas-run Al Aqsa TV network and a cheese and dairy factory in Gaza City. Another two missiles were fired at a police station in the Nusseirat refugee camp including a telecommunications company. Palestinian medical sources reported that at least three children were injured in the attacks. Days earlier, Israeli planes dropped flyers along the Israel-Gaza border warning residents to get ready for a “response” to what Israel says is Hamas’ escalation of violence against Israeli targets.
The recent violence has even gotten the US concerned. On April 2, US State Department spokesperson Philip Crowley said that while Israel has a “right to defend itself” his government believed military action would not solve the conflict. “Therefore, Israel and the Palestinian Authority need to engage in direct negotiations.”
London also expressed concern with Israel’s air strikes on April 2, saying that it was “concerned with the escalation of violence in Gaza and southern Israel over the past week, “encouraging all parties to show restraint.
Meanwhile, Palestinians marked Land Day on March 30, commemorating the killing of six Palestinians inside the Green Line during a demonstration against Israeli land confiscations in 1976. Palestinians across the board marked the day with demonstrations and marches. One Palestinian was killed and 16 injured by Israeli air strikes on that day.
Also on the occasion of Land Day, the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics announced that Israel controls over 85% of the area of historical Palestine, with Jewish settlements in the West Bank focused in and around Jerusalem where 55% of the settlers live.
On that note, Israel received some tough love from US President Barak Obama. On March 31, Obama said in an interview with MSNBC that “I think Prime Minister Netanyahu intellectually understands that he has got to take some bold steps. I think politically he feels it” adding that the Palestinians also had to take steps in return. The US has reportedly demanded that Israel freeze settlements in east Jerusalem for a period of four months so indirect negotiations could resume. This demand is supposedly among 10 others Obama wants Israel to meet including opening a Palestinian commercial interests’ office in east Jerusalem and ending the razing of Palestinian homes in the city.
Prime Minister Salam Fayyad seems to have a plan of his own, describing it in a detailed interview with Haaretz on April 2. Fayyad, who has marketed his two-year plan for establishing a Palestinian state seems to be undeterred by the failed diplomatic attempts at peace.
“The birth of a Palestinian state will be celebrated as a day of joy by the entire community of nations," Fayyad said in the interview. “The time for this baby to be born will come," he said, "and we estimate it will come around 2011. That is our vision, and a reflection of our will to exercise our right to live in freedom and dignity in the country [where] we are born, alongside the State of Israel in complete harmony."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said Fayyad, “has succumbed to the settlers,” stressing that "peace will be made between equals, not between masters and slaves."
"It is the right of an oppressed nation to say 'enough'," said Fayyad. "No one should be expected to stand for injustice, not least the Palestinians.”
Finally, the 22nd Arab Summit was held in the Libyan city of Serte from March 27 to March 28. President Abbas, who attended the summit and who also met on the margins with Libyan President Muammar Qaddaffi, said he was “satisfied” with the summits results and hoped to see them implemented, especially those concerning Jerusalem and Palestine. Arab foreign ministers had previously pledged $500 million to Al Aqsa and Arab leaders said they would not back a return to negotiations without a freeze of settlements.
My letters to the New York Times & The Washington Post RE Obama weighs new peace plan for the Middle East & Palestinians building a non-violent state
I very much hope that a solid peace plan securing a secular two state solution to end the Palestine/Israel conflict emerges soon, and that it is fully in line with The Arab Peace Initiative on all the core issues:
I- Full Israeli withdrawal from all the territories occupied since 1967, including the Syrian Golan Heights, to the June 4, 1967 lines as well as the remaining occupied Lebanese territories in the south of Lebanon.
II- Achievement of a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem to be agreed upon in accordance with U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194. (United Nations A/RES/194 (III) 11 December 1948 Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible)
III- The acceptance of the establishment of a sovereign independent Palestinian state on the Palestinian territories occupied since June 4, 1967 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Anne Selden Annab
RE: Palestinians Try a Less Violent Path to Resistance, Palestinians headed to plant trees last month in the West Bank, part of a new, nonviolent approach to assert their land claims.
Excellent to see this report noticing Palestinians taking a nonviolent approach- focusing in on self empowerment... taking ownership of the process of building a state.
I very much hope that Israel decides soon to end its illegal occupation, to stop its Apartheid policies and its land grabs, to respect international law and to work with Palestine to create a just and lasting peace for everyone's sake.
Anne Selden Annab
Suleiman Alqam marks a lifetime with UNRWA: Benefiting from UNRWA schools, shelters and social services
Suleiman Alqam marks a lifetime with UNRWA
6 April 2010
Suleiman Alqam has spent nearly 60 years with UNRWA. As a child he attended UNRWA schools and received food aid in the West Bank. Later he worked for UNRWA’s health department and food distribution centres in Amman. As he approaches retirement, the years he has spent with the Agency have left him grateful for the opportunities given to him.
Born in Nuweimi camp in 1951, Suleiman’s family was originally from Barfilia, near Ramla. As refugees, Sulieman’s mother and father moved to Nuweimi camp in the West Bank in 1950 “in order to benefit from UNRWA schools, shelters and social services”.
Suleiman and his three younger sisters received a free education at UNRWA’s Nuweimi school, along with food that the agency distributed. When war broke out in 1967, the family relocated to Al Jaffah in Jordan. Soon after, Suleiman’s father died of a heart attack and Suleiman, despite being a good student with high grades, was forced to leave school while only in the 8th grade to support his family.
Suleiman began his work with UNRWA in 1971 and has continued to work for UNRWA in different capacities for nearly 40 years. “The work was not always easy,” Suleiman says.
“It was a difficult decision to work as a sanitation labourer in the camps while my friends and neighbours were all at school,” he says. “The camps were especially difficult to clean back then as the streets were not paved, making it difficult to drive carts and there were no plastic bags so garbage was thrown on the streets.”
Suleiman remembers people looking down on him for his work, but as the head of his family, Suleiman was grateful for the salary necessary to support his mother and sisters.
After forty years of work with UNRWA, Suleiman says the Agency has improved. It now provides more essential medicine and services, but, says Sulieman, could use more staff to carry out its work.
As for Suleiman’s family, his four children also went to UNRWA schools. They now have degrees in accounting and vehicle maintenance.
Suleiman says UNRWA has played an important role in his life. The Agency has provided an opportunity for education for him and his family, continued employment and stability.
Suleiman will retire next year, and looking back on his life with UNRWA, he is proud that his work has benefited not only his family but the families of other Palestine refugees.
To mark World Refugee Day on 20 June, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) is holding a short-film competition... “Will We Meet?”
“Will We Meet?” young filmmakers’ competition to mark World Refugee Day
To mark World Refugee Day on 20 June, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) is holding a short-film competition.
If you are an ambitious young film maker (under 26), or just have an idea for a clip, this is your chance to share, with an international audience, what you want to say about your world and the people in it, your hopes and aspirations.
Your film must reflect the theme “Will We Meet?” in an original and creative way and be between 1 and 5 minutes long.
Entries will be judged by a panel of UNRWA and Palestinian film makers. Entrants will compete in two age categories: under 18 and 18-26.
First, second and third prizes will be awarded in each age category and will receive a cash prize.
First prize: US$1,500
Second prize: US$1,000
Third prize: US$500
All prize-winning films will be screened at an event to mark World Refugee Day.
Submissions of entries
Submit your film by sending it on DVD region 1 in avi or mpeg format to your nearest field office. Please mark the envelope 'Public information - film competition’
Please ensure that with the DVD you include your name, age, address, email and phone number.
All films must reach UNRWA by Sunday 30 May 2010.
All materials submitted must be original and produced for the purposes of this competition and not screened elsewhere.
UNRWA reserves the rights to later use of the submitted films.
If you have any questions please email email@example.com
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Excellent to see Mustafa Barghouthi's "Israel knows apartheid has no future", as I very much hope that Palestine and a fully secular two state solution to end the Israel/Palestine conflict can survive the many challenges ahead.
In the spirit of that, for Palestine's sake, I have to add that I suspect that American politicians would be much more likely to "embrace the Palestinian struggle" if the people's boycott energy was also going towards boycotting religious extremism and militancy.
Anne Selden Annab
My letters 4-6-2010 to USA Today, The Daily Star, & The Guardian regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict
Good to see USA Today taking the stand that the Israeli settlement push hurts U.S. interests and the peace process. I very much agree with that headline and I hope it helps prod more people into putting more energy and thought into calming down and ending the Israel/ Palestine conflict.
Dr. Hussein Ibish of the American Task Force on Palestine, wisely points out that the Obama administration is taking a more holistic approach to the Middle East and has "rightly identified Palestine and the Israeli occupation that began in 1967 as the center of this dynamic pattern because of its political and symbolic importance throughout the region." http://www.americantaskforce.org/in_media/pr/2010/03/31/1270008000
Anne Selden Annab
RE: Divided, the Palestinians won't risk a third intifada By Hossam Ezzedine
I totally agree that Israel is trying to provoke Palestinians. However I think Israel is trying to provoke much more than the potential violence of a third intifada: I think Israel is doing all it can to provoke radicals and empower religious extremism in hopes of completely destroying Palestine.
By seriously working towards a secular two state solution to end the Israel/Palestine conflict, Palestinians are positioned to gain serious mainstream support and real political power. Radicals and religious extremists are eager to derail a negotiated end to the Israel/Palestine conflict and their bellicose stupidity shifts mainstream sympathy and support away from Palestine.
Anne Selden Annab
RE: Israelis must integrate to survive, The increase in ultra-Orthodox Jews and Arabs is a social timebomb that threatens the Jewish state's long-term survival
I very much appreciated the forthright honesty of "Israelis must integrate to survive, The increase in ultra-Orthodox Jews and Arabs is a social timebomb that threatens the Jewish state's long-term survival"
I wish I could object to the way the author lumps ultra-Orthodox Jews and Arabs into one category, but I can't since his main point is that "We at the mainstream must change our view of the growing minorities and treat them as the next frontier of economic opportunity and growth. If they prosper, we will all prosper"
Anne Selden Annab
The Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
James J. Zogby
Before it is too late
Monday, April 5, 2010
Growing Gardens for Palestine
"With the turbulence surrounding diplomacy and the Middle East peace process, it is more urgent than ever for civil society to unite around the obvious reality that a conflict-ending solution can only be attained through the creation of a Palestinian state living side by side with Israel in peace and security.
The two-state solution became official US policy under President George W. Bush, and it is today seen as a national security priority under President Barack Obama. It has been adopted internationally by the United Nations, the Middle East Quartet, the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the Arab League and by successive Israeli governments." Build a partnership for Middle East peace within the United States By Ziad Asali
I went with trepidation- and I left totally impressed. These people really do know how to listen and speak to America, they know how the system works and how to influence policy in positive ways for Palestine AND America.
I feel honored to have been in their 7th floor offices, to have seen the intriguing artwork on the walls, gazed out the big windows to the busy city below- and sat in comfort in Dr. Ziad Asali's office as we spoke easily about awkward and difficult topics.
Ziad & his wife Nailia are charming, kind, compassionate, thoughtful, well informed, well educated people... both are very bright and experienced- seasoned but not cynical- obviously modest and interesting people indeed.
Dr. Ibish told me privately that "in all their work with the Arab-American community over decades, and for the past seven years at ATFP both Ziad and Nailia have been completely volunteers and have never taken a penny of compensation for their efforts. On the contrary, they've devoted a good deal of their private resources to helping to found and sustain this organization." (Visit their webpage to help keep them going- click on KEEP ATFP INDEPENDENT if you want to donate online or to find information on how to make a donation via mail, wire, fax or phone)
Dr. Ziad Asali has a knack for attracting and valuing the best and the brightest and he has assembled a highly competent team of articulate people, right in the heart of Washington DC where they can confer and do the most good.
They have compelling priorities: They believe in a healthy and serious debate to define and defend the national interest. Not long ago Dr. Asali testified before Congress (ATFP Press Release), and Dr. Hussein Ibish has been very busy with speaking engagements on college campuses. Ibish wrote a book, published this past year, patiently explaining what is wrong with the one-state agenda
The ATFP is dedicated to "advocating that it is in the American national interest to promote an end to the conflict in the Middle East through a negotiated agreement that provides for two states - Israel and Palestine - living side by side in peace and security".... furthermore the "ATFP is strictly opposed to all acts of violence against civilians no matter the cause and no matter who the victims or perpetrators may be. The Task Force advocates the development of a Palestinian state that is democratic, pluralistic, non-militarized and neutral in armed conflicts." http://www.americantaskforce.org/about_us
ATFP's website is a treasure trove of up to date, highly relevant information, news and opinion concerning Palestine. They don't use cheap tricks- they use hard work, careful analysis and diplomacy to do what they can to help end the contentious Israel/Palestine conflict...for every one's sake.
They are Golden Rule people through and through: By wisely nurturing a totally civilized, reasonable and sustainable conversation they are creating real respect for a real Palestinian state.
The Palestinian State and Institution Building Program
Documents detailing the state and institution building program of the 13th Palestinian Government, including the overall plan and priority interventions for 2010.
"The fact is that the one-state argument completely lets Israel off the hook with regard to settlements. First, if it's one state, it hardly matters where people live (it might be a civil tort about payments for expropriated lands, at most). Second, if it's a single state, they're not settlements, because there is also no occupation. Third, it allows the Israeli right to say that the occupation is defensive and legitimate and so are the settlements because all forms of Palestinian nationalism are antithetical to the continued existence of Israel, a member state of the United Nations. All arguments about settlements and occupation immediately go right out the window. People who advocate a single state need to understand this clearly." Hussein Ibish
|Become Hussein's friend|
|Follow Ibish on Twitter|
World Press Roundup: Middle East News
Keep up to date with what is going on in the Middle East with ATFP's World Press Roundup