Labels

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Obama’s “non-doctrine” explained

"... After all, if it really were about stability and oil, the most logical thing would’ve been to intervene on the side of Qaddafi, who has imposed ruthless stability and provided cheap petroleum. However, this robust intervention in one corner of the developing “Arab Spring” shows Washington clearly making a choice on behalf of dramatic and revolutionary change." Hussein Ibish Obama’s “non-doctrine” explained

No comments:

Post a Comment