Labels

Monday, January 11, 2010

Naomi Shihab Nye and Marie Ponsot Elected Chancellors of the Academy of American Poets

Naomi Shihab Nye and Marie Ponsot Elected Chancellors of the Academy of American Poets

New York, January 11—Tree Swenson, Executive Director of the Academy of American Poets, announced that Naomi Shihab Nye and Marie Ponsot have been elected to the Board of Chancellors, the Academy's advisory board of distinguished poets.

They were elected by current Academy Chancellors Frank Bidart, Victor Hernández Cruz, Rita Dove, Marilyn Hacker, Lyn Hejinian, Edward Hirsch, Sharon Olds, Ron Padgett, Carl Phillips, Robert Pinsky, Kay Ryan, Gary Snyder, Gerald Stern, Susan Stewart, Ellen Bryant Voigt, and C. K. Williams.

Naomi Shihab Nye was born in St. Louis in 1952. She received a B.A. in English and World Religions from Trinitiy University in San Antonio, Texas. Her numerous books of poetry, include You and Yours (BOA Editions, 2005), which received the Isabella Gardner Poetry Award, 19 Varieties of Gazelle: Poems of the Middle East (2002), and Fuel (1998). She is also the author of award-winning children's books, the most recent of which is Honeybee (Greenwillow Books, 2008), which won a 2008 Arab American Book Award in the Children's/Young Adult category.

Among Nye's awards and honors are a Guggenheim Fellowship, a Lannan Fellowship, and four Pushcart Prizes. In 1988 she received the Academy of American Poets' Lavan Younger Poets Award, selected by W. S. Merwin. She has been a visiting writer at the Michener Center at the University of Texas at Austin, and the University of Hawai'i. She currently lives in San Antonio, Texas.

About Nye's poetry, Academy Chancellor Edward Hirsch recently said:

A resident of Texas, a citizen of the world, Naomi Shihab Nye is a deeply humane poet whose work crosses borders and lifts spirits. She nourishes intimacy and fosters understanding. She is also a beloved writer and indefatigable anthologist for children, preteens, and young-adults, who flies what she calls the flag of childhood.


Marie Ponsot was born in New York City in 1921. Her first poetry collection, True Minds, was published in Lawrence Ferlinghetti's City Lights series in 1956. She is the author of several books of poems, including Easy (Knopf, 2009), Springing (2002), and The Bird Catcher (1998), which won the National Book Critics Circle Award and was a finalist for the 1999 Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize from the Academy of American Poets.

Ponsot, who also translates books from the French, has taught in graduate programs at Columbia University, New York University, Queens College, Beijing United University, and the Poetry Center of the YMHA. Among her awards are a creative writing grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, the Frost Medal from the Poetry Society of America, and the Shaughnessy Medal from the Modern Language Association. Ponsot currently teaches in the graduate writing program at New School University.

About Ponsot's poetry, Academy Chancellor Susan Stewart recently wrote:

If you've ever found a line of sweet water running through salt water, or spied a red thread running through a dull nest, or felt a breeze inside an unforgiving wind, you know something of the way the poems of Marie Ponsot penetrate the ordinary noise of our time. What she has written of her relation to the night sky—'it becomes the infinite / air of imagination that stirs immense / among losses and leaves me less desolate'—could be claimed by her readers as a description of her own work, which pulls us always to forms of thought and attention that surprise and enlarge and cheer us.

For more information about these poets and to read samples of their work, please visit www.poets.org.

The Board of Chancellors was established in 1946 by the Academy's founder, Marie Bullock, who said that:

[Chancellors] must be chosen from amongst literary persons of the highest standing. They must themselves be known for their good judgment and eminent integrity of opinion. They should geographically represent the entire United States, so that their choices will be representative of the nation as a whole, and not of one trend of thought, or literary clique, or section."

The Academy of American Poets' Board of Chancellors elects the recipients of the Wallace Stevens Award and the Academy of American Poets Fellowship. They also act as consultants to the organization on matters of artistic direction and programming and serve as ambassadors of poetry in the world at large. Previous Chancellors of the Academy have included Marianne Moore, W.H. Auden, Robert Lowell, Elizabeth Bishop, John Berryman, Robert Penn Warren, and James Merrill, among others.

About the Academy of American Poets

The Academy of American Poets is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization founded in 1934 to foster appreciation for contemporary poetry and to support American poets at all stages of their careers. For over three generations, the Academy has connected millions of people to great poetry through programs such as National Poetry Month, the largest literary celebration in the world; Poets.org, the most popular site about poetry on the web, presenting a wealth of great poems, poet biographies, essays, and interactive discussions about poetry; the Poetry Audio Archive, capturing the voices of contemporary American poets for generations to come; American Poet, a biannual literary journal; and an annual series of poetry readings and special events. The Academy also awards prizes to accomplished poets at all stages of their careers—from hundreds of student prizes at colleges nationwide to the Wallace Stevens Award for lifetime achievement in the art of poetry. For more information, visit www.poets.org.

http://www.poets.org/images/75th_landing_logo2.gif
http://www.poets.org/images/about_ourfounding.gif
http://www.poets.org/images/about_ourmission_text.gif

My letter to the Wall Street Journal RE Taking the Measure of Obama's Foreign Policy by Eliot A. Cohen

RE: Taking the Measure of Obama's Foreign Policy, Saying that the U.S. will 'bear witness' to brutality around the word is, in effect, to say that we will send flowers to funerals.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703481004574646080636258614.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion

Dear Editor,

I disagree with Mr. Cohen's "
Taking the Measure of Obama's Foreign Policy" for I do not think Cohen's sarcasm and cynicism help anyone- except of course America's enemies.

We live in a global information age with the whole world interconnected and empowered by the Internet: The day that Obama entered the White House the web page http://www.whitehouse.gov/ was redesigned to be very user friendly. In addition the Obama administration's outreach takes online social network options like facebook seriously. It all adds up... and it helps create a more productive dialog worldwide.

Obama is a breathe of fresh air and living proof that institutionalized bigotry and injustice can be overcome. That message alone has huge ramifications for peace in the Middle East.

Furthermore Obama's speeches really are good- some are even quite inspiring and all are firmly rooted in American ideals. Isn't that what a good leader is supposed to be all about?! But the burden of good leadership is not the president's alone- we the people and all our many pundits help carry forth diplomatic efforts every day and every where we go. We need to be equipped with good examples, accurate information, pertinent analysis and insights into all the many challenges of modern life so that we can, each in our own way, help shape better polices- both foreign and domestic.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab

My letter to the Washington Post RE The limits of ambition, U.S. ambition alone won't forge Mideast peace By Jackson Diehl

RE: The limits of ambition, U.S. ambition alone won't forge Mideast peace By Jackson Diehl
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/10/AR2010011002146.html

Dear Editor,

Failures to forge peace in the Middle East are not an embarrassment for the US- or any administration: There is no shame in trying to find a way out
for all the many men, women and children being tortured and destroyed by the Palestine/Israel conflict.

Jerusalem is crucially important to three major faiths and to many historians, which means outsiders worldwide feel a very real sense of ownership. Religious or not everyone wants the option to be free to explore and celebrate this valuable cultural treasure- and who gets to give the tour makes a big difference in what heritage is preserved for future generations as well as how the story is told. Decent people are drawn into taking sides and exasperating hostilities... and here we are today with hate mongering ideologues, bigots, bullies, con artists, useful idiots and terrorists worldwide thriving on the continuation of conflict in "The Holy Land".

As things are today, tomorrow it will only be worse. There is no magic moment for peace- there is only momentum away or momentum towards a fair and just negotiated settlement- a solution...and a better way forward.
The Arab Peace Initiative "Emanating from the conviction of the Arab countries that a military solution to the conflict will not achieve peace or provide security for the parties" offers all sides a chance to calm down the angry rhetoric, rein in wild fantasies, halt religious extremism (and investments in injustice and institutionalized bigotry) in order to start the business of building a just and last peace for all the people... for everyone's sake.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab

We need a Golden Rule Peace for Israel and Palestine
A peace based on do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Palestinian Sun Bird by Ismail Shammout

Sunday, January 10, 2010

My letter to the Boston Globe RE Globe Editorial: A good year for Mideast peace

RE: Boston Globe Editorial: A good year for Mideast peace
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2010/01/10/a_good_year_for_mideast_peace/

Dear Editor,

Yes indeed this year is a very good year for Mideast peace, and that idea deserves all the positive support we can muster: An actual end to the Israel/Palestine conflict in line with international law- and fully respecting basic human rights... not a temporary truce but a just and lasting peace. It will not be perfect- but it will be a vast improvement compared to the cruel hostilities that have harmed countless innocent and increasingly vulnerable men, women and children.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab

"Assessing the Position" By Hassan Khader

Assessing the Position
by Hassan Khader
Al-Ayyam (Opinion)
January 8, 2010 - 12:00am
http://www.al-ayyam.ps/znews/site/template/article.aspx?did=130807&Date=1/8/2010


Translated by ATFP

Four factors govern Egypt’s policy towards the Gaza Strip:

1. The Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, the upholding of which is a key priority for Egyptian national security.

2. Concerns triggered by Israel’s desire to transfer responsibility for the Gaza Strip onto the Egyptian state, especially in light of Israel’s redeployment from the strip, and its attempts to rid itself of the obligations imposed by international law on the occupying power.

3. Concerns arising from the de facto rule in the Gaza Strip by the Muslim Brotherhood, which poses an additional threat to the Egyptian national security. This threat results from the well-established ties between the Gaza Muslim Brotherhood and its banned mother organization in Egypt, and the special relationship linking the Brotherhood generally with Iran, Syria, and other radical Islamist organizations in different parts of the Arab world.

4. Its ongoing efforts to end the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict through negotiations that would lead to a Palestine state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, while simultaneously preventing Egyptian adoption of any positions that contradict its peace treaty with Israel or that would jeopardize its relations with the United States.

These factors are all interrelated, and under certain circumstances some issues become paramount, while at other times different concerns become priorities. Three overriding facts are most determinative of this process: first, that the Gaza Strip shares a border with Egypt; second, that Egypt is a big country; and third, the historical relationship between Egypt and Palestine.

The border connecting Egypt and the Gaza Strip makes it possible for militants to infiltrate into the Sinai, and launch attacks against Israel from Egyptian territory. The border also raises the possibility of Egypt’s loss of control over the security in Sinai in the event of cooperation between the Muslim Brotherhood on both sides of the Gaza border, concerns exacerbated by the fact that the special relationship between Hamas and Iran has now created a de facto Iranian presence on Egypt’s borders.

The Egyptians do not want threats to their national security arising at their own borders. Similarly, the Syrians prevent any attacks on Israel from their territory in Golan, notwithstanding the historic relationships between Syria and countless Palestinian and other radical organizations.

Egypt considers the Palestinian issue to be central to its national security, and regional responsibilities. Accordingly, based on long historical experience, Egypt has formulated a complex policy on this issue. What matters is not whether the Egyptian perceptions are right or wrong, but rather that the Palestinian issue is the prime source that influences Egypt’s national security policymaking. In view of this, and because the policies and stances of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority coincide with Egypt’s positions, any recognition of the legitimacy of Hamas rule contradicts Egyptian interests. Because it is the only way to achieve their national goals, the Egyptians have tried in various ways to unite the Palestinian polity, which would ultimately have to entail the integration of Hamas into the Palestinian political structure, and enable the Palestinians to adhere to a unified stance that is consistent with regional and global realities.

Hamas conduct on the border with Egypt constitutes an open challenge to core Egyptian policies. One example to this confrontation has been shooting at Egyptian soldiers, recently resulting in the death of one of them. This suggests that Hamas leaders fail to comprehend the reality of their situation, and the realities of Egyptian politics.

Under any circumstances, the results will not favor Hamas, even though the Egyptians have found themselves forced into making difficult decisions such as buidling a wall along their side of the border with the Gaza Strip. As for the humanitarian catastrophe befalling the people of Gaza, the responsibility does not rest on the shoulders of regime in Cairo, that would show no mercy to anyone if threatened, but on the shoulders of those who do not assess the political situation with the kind of calibrated scale used for measuring gold.

~~~~~~~~~~


Enemies of humanity

Editorial
Enemies of humanity

Once again, Jordan finds itself at the forefront of countries fighting terrorism and offering sacrifices for this noble cause.

When in 2005 terrorists chose to attack this peaceful country that always prided itself on its record of safety and stability, which is considered its biggest asset in this volatile region of the world, they took the war between Jordan and terrorist groups to a new high.

Jordan then was left with one option: to hit back as hard as it can, not with the aim of seeking revenge, but to ensure that such a heinous crime against innocent civilians would not be repeated, neither here in Jordan nor anywhere else in the world.

Jordan learned a lot from the November 9, 2005 blasts that targeted its hotels, leaving dozens killed and many others injured. The most important lesson was that it cannot sit idle and wait until terrorists strike again at the time and place of their choice. It learned that Al Qaeda must not be given breathing space and should not have the comfort of plotting its next attacks against Jordanian citizens or any other innocent civilians around the world without being hit hard whenever possible and wherever its elements exist.

Jordan also learned that the war of terror launched by Al Qaeda against the civilised world, which expanded to include the Jordanian people, does not target one country, race or religion, and is not restricted to any particular geographic region of the world.

On November 10, 2005, the people of Jordan woke up to a new reality, to find themselves the target of Al Qaeda along with many peoples around the globe. A new reality popped up in Jordanian hotels and shopping malls, which ever since then hired guards and installed metal detectors, a scene not familiar in the country before, as a grim reminder of that ominous day.

The November 9 attacks shocked the Jordanian people, but certainly did not weaken their resolve to fight terror. Other attacks were thwarted by the authorities, thanks to their vigilance, and to the fact that the war was taken to Al Qaeda’s home turf, first in Iraq and then to other parts of the world, mainly Afghanistan.

Jordan’s efforts were part of a global war on terror in which many states of the world are taking part including Arab, Muslim and non-Muslim countries.

As part of this fight, Jordan reportedly lost a senior intelligence officer who was targeted along with seven operatives of the Central Intelligence Agency when a suicide attacker blew himself up on December 30 in Afghanistan, considered a launch-pad for many Al Qaeda attacks.

This loss certainly will not discourage Jordan from continuing its war on terror, which is not just a military and an intelligence one. It is a war against the enemies of humanity and the enemies of Islam.

These people who kill and destroy in the name of Islam, a tolerant faith that preaches peace and coexistence, should not be allowed to do what they are doing.

This war should not stop until those enemies of humanity are defeated once and for all.


10 January 2010

Terrorism is personal

Jordan Times
Letters to the Editor
‘Terrorism is personal’

The scattered words of praise for terrorists in the Arab world convey a deep moral and philosophical flaw in the minds of those who express such support for terrorists boarding planes for the sole purpose of killing all aboard for political gains or grievances.


These savages, who are willing to murder innocent people to make a political statement, are the most evil and deranged in society. When these terrorists fail to win by appealing to reason, they resort violence in order to appeal to our fear of death.

We know what they stand for, but do we know what we stand for?

Thanks to these brutes, our privacy will be invaded every time we board a plane just because we happen to share a country with these brainwashed murderers. Our wives and sisters will be exposed to the most invasive rigorous security checks technology has to offer just because we happen to be Arab or Muslim.

It is time that we all speak up against targeting innocent civilians for the sake of our humanity, love for peace and respect for human life everywhere.

Arabs and Muslims have paid a high price for the murderous ideology of an insignificant minority of Muslims. They have brought occupation and humiliation to millions of Arabs and Muslims, and as of now we will pay a personal price for their evil deeds.

The war against terrorism is now personal.


Naseer Alomari,
Amman

10 January 2010

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Yes the Palestinian cause was a very just cause...

Connecting the dots: How pretty peace efforts push us into empowering Islamists- and terror.... and the destruction of Palestine.

Rich Siegel – "In Palestine" [Video-Music]



It is a beautiful song...so civilized and compassionate- and such solid proof that decent Jewish individuals support Palestine. Look at most every pro-Palestine effort and you find helpful Jewish individuals who are warm and supportive of Palestine- and Palestinian resistance- FREE GAZA!

In bending over backwards to be supportive of Palestine far too many people are reluctant to say WHOA DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE EMPOWERING HAMAS & ISLAMIC JIHAD!!!

New initiatives for Palestine keep popping up.... and from what I can see they are very much centered on promoting a one state 'solution'.

But isn't that exactly what Israeli war mongers and illegal settlers want- all of Palestine?!

Meanwhile, a lethal combination of anti-America rhetoric and bad arguments tend to infiltrate "pro-Palestine" news and opinion, which pretty much guarantees that wiser folks, and most Americans, will find other very important things to care about.

Yes the hegemony of the ongoing Israeli made Nakba is a huge tragedy and a horrible crime against all of humanity.

Yes the Palestinian cause was a very just cause... but why do so many pro-Palestine activists think rock throwing is non-violence?

For all the many very real non-violent Palestinians, we need to be aware of political realities and the importance of diplomacy... and the crucial need to support a negotiated end to the horrors and the hate generated by the Israel/Palestine conflict.

We need a Golden Rule Peace for Israel and Palestine


for every one's sake


"Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace..."

UNWRA NEWSROOM: Letter to the Editor of Yedioth from UNRWA Spokesperson rejecting false allegations

Letter to the Editor of Yedioth from UNRWA Spokesperson rejecting false allegations

Dear Sir/Madam,

The article in your paper today (8 January 2010) "Israel to pay the UN Compensation" falsely alleges that there were militants in our compound in Gaza when it was attacked by the IDF on 15 January 2009. This is blatant misinformation. At no stage has any evidence been produced to show that there were militants in any UN installations during the fighting in Gaza. The constant repetition of these falsehoods has had the unfortunate effect of embedding them in the minds of the Israeli public.

Chris Gunness,
UNRWA Spokesman.

My letter to the Washington Post RE Clinton pushes to revive stalled Middle East peace talks


RE: Clinton pushes to revive stalled Middle East peace talks
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/08/AR2010010803674.html

Dear Editor,

Good to hear that the Obama administration is reinvigorating a push for peace in the Middle East- specifically a push for Palestine to become an independent and viable state. It will not be easy... but it is very necessary for everyone's sake.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab


A Palestinian woman walks behind a partly cut olive tree in the northern West Bank village of Burin, Thursday, Jan., 7, 2010. According to Burin's mayor, Jewish settlers cut more than 20 olive trees in the village in protest against the Israeli army's recent evacuation of an unauthorized settlement outpost in the area. (AP Photo/Nasser Ishtayeh)

Dead Sea Scrolls: "...What is more important is how to safeguard them and protect them from any form of exploitation."




Bone of contention

The 2,000-year-old Dead Sea Scrolls have become a serious bone of contention between Jordan, the Palestinians and Israel after the latter seized them in the wake of its occupation of the West Bank in 1967.

The legal squabble over which country has jurisdiction over the artefacts, which were recently on display at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, threatens to mushroom into a political controversy where the Canadian government could end up taking centre stage.

All sides have made claims over the two-millennia old scrolls and asked Ottawa to honour their respective positions. This growing dispute, however, is not a free-for-all controversy as there are international guidelines to govern its settlement.

For starters, there is no dispute over the fact that the religious manuscripts were in a Jordanian museum when Israel occupied East Jerusalem in 1967. There is also no doubt that the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, was an integral part of the Jordanian territory. There is also no question about the applicability of the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict to this confrontation.

The primary concern remains the protection and the preservation of these important discoveries that provided the earliest written sources of the Old Testament.

Second, the application of the relevant international law must be the basis for the resolution of this dispute.

It would seem that the only sensible way out of this deadlock is to refer the case to the International Court of Justice for a proper and lawful resolution. Or else, UNESCO can be called upon to examine this crisis in its entirety and shed more light on how it should be pursued and resolved.

In any case, this issue must not be blown out of proportion as a resolution can be found on the basis of the foregoing undisputed facts and principles.

These historical and religious treasures belong to all humanity, including the three monotheistic faiths. What is more important is how to safeguard them and protect them from any form of exploitation.


8 January 2010

Friday, January 8, 2010

IBISHBLOG: The TSA, discrimination and profiling in the United States

by Hussein Ibish

January 6, 2010 - 9:30am

The new TSA security directive following the failed Christmas Day terrorist attack on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit raises the specter of ethnic and religious profiling in the most direct way since the 9/11 attacks. The first thing that needs to be acknowledged is that the primary blame for all kinds of negative fallout from terrorist attacks -- whether they succeed in killing the innocent or, as in this case, are simply a halfwit setting fire to his own trousers -- belongs squarely with the terrorists themselves and with their sympathizers...READ MORE