Zero Dark Zero |
RE Zero Dark Zero by Roger Cohen
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/opinion/global/zero-dark-zero.html?ref=global
Dear Editor,
"Perfect Dark Zero" was a hugely popular first-person shooter video game not long ago and Roger Cohen's "Zero Dark Zero" op-ed is an exercise in exactly that type of game playing as he targets international law and universal basic human rights for destruction all so that Israel can have a peace process that continues to demonize, impoverish, imprison and/or displace the native non-Jewish population of Israel and Palestine.
The idea that “If the refugees were to return, you would not have a two-state solution, you’d have a Palestine next to a Palestine.” is wrong. You'd still have an Israel next to a Palestine. You'd still have a very strong already firmly established Israel with many Jewish citizens living and working alongside non-Jewish citizens. But you would also have a free Palestine living in peace and security alongside Israel, creating its own museums and national anthem and job opportunities and options for the people who chose to help build and invest in a sovereign Palestinian state.
A fully secular two state solution to once and for ALL end the Israel-Palestine really is the best way forward. That idea should not cause deep despondency- it should inspire thoughtful and compassionate ponderings on how we can, each in our way, help bring a just and lasting peace to the people of both Israel and Palestine.
Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
NOTES
"We really hope everybody will step back a little and try to find a way to proceed very calmly and very thoughtfully in these next days (and) leave the opportunities for peaceful resolution open." U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry
The Balfour Declaration: If wording counts....
Jordanian Diplomat Marwan Muasher (his country’s first ambassador to Israel, where he made many friends) points out the importance of The Arab Peace Initiative... & the fact that Obama Should Try to Help Solve Conflict
*******
".... it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
What
is an Israeli settlement The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countriesPalestinian Refugees(1948-NOW) refused their right to return... and their right to live in peace free from religious bigotry and injustice.
The Golden Rule... Do
unto others as you would have them do unto you
"Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In
small places, close to home - so close and so small that
they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they
are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood
he lives in; the school or college he attends; the
factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the
places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal
justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without
discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there,
they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted
citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall
look in vain for progress in the larger world."
Eleanor Roosevelt
Empowering
Peace & Palestine
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine."
Refugees
and the Right of Return
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine."
Palestinian
refugees must be given the option to exercise their
right of return (as well as receive compensation for
their losses arising from their dispossession and
displacement) though refugees may prefer other options
such as: (i) resettlement in third countries, (ii)
resettlement in a newly independent Palestine (even
though they originate from that part of Palestine which
became Israel) or (iii) normalization of their legal
status in the host country where they currently reside.
What is important is that individual refugees decide for
themselves which option they prefer – a decision must
not be imposed upon them.
UN Resolution 194 from 1948 : The refugees wishing to
return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours
should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date,
and that compensation should be paid for the property of those
choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property
which, under principles of international law or in equity,
should be made good by the Governments or authorities
responsible.
Emanating from the conviction of the Arab countries that a military solution to the conflict will not achieve peace or provide security for the parties, the council:
1. Requests Israel to reconsider its policies and declare that a
just peace is its strategic option as well.
2. Further calls upon Israel to affirm:
I- Full Israeli withdrawal from all the territories occupied since 1967, including the Syrian Golan Heights, to the June 4, 1967 lines as well as the remaining occupied Lebanese territories in the south of Lebanon.II- Achievement of a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem to be agreed upon in accordance with U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194.III- The acceptance of the establishment of a sovereign independent Palestinian state on the Palestinian territories occupied since June 4, 1967 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
3. Consequently, the Arab countries affirm the following:
I- Consider the Arab-Israeli conflict ended, and enter into a peace agreement with Israel, and provide security for all the states of the region.II- Establish normal relations with Israel in the context of this comprehensive peace.
4. Assures the rejection of all forms of Palestinian patriation
which conflict with the special circumstances of the Arab host
countries.
5. Calls upon the government of Israel and all Israelis to accept
this initiative in order to safeguard the prospects for peace and
stop the further shedding of blood, enabling the Arab countries
and Israel to live in peace and good neighbourliness and provide
future generations with security, stability and prosperity.
6. Invites the international community and all countries and
organisations to support this initiative.
7. Requests the chairman of the summit to form a special committee
composed of some of its concerned member states and the secretary
general of the League of Arab States to pursue the necessary
contacts to gain support for this initiative at all levels,
particularly from the United Nations, the Security Council, the
United States of America, the Russian Federation, the Muslim
states and the European Union.
No comments:
Post a Comment