Labels

Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meaning. Show all posts

Monday, June 1, 2026

"For ease and speed, we are degrading our ability to connect and to organise our societies. We must assert our trust in humans over machines" Nesrine Malik

 OpinionAI (artificial intelligence)

AI is devoid of meaning and humanity. That’s why its vapid voice suits this political moment

 
Nesrine Malik

Here is a nightmare scenario for you. You are writing a book about how AI reshapes reality. You start using it as a research partner, confident that you are applying the right hygiene by not letting it actually write a sentence of the book. You think you’ll be careful, you will double check everything. And then your book comes out and it appears that it includes more than a half dozen misattributed or fake quotes. Steven Rosenbaum, the unfortunate writer, acknowledged that sometimes the output of AI was “staggeringly wrong”, but still, errors crept in.

There are others. A Commonwealth prize-winning short story became engulfed in claims that it carried the hallmarks of AI. And every time I see a story of a journalist caught out by fake AI quotes during research, I cross myself – there but for the grace of God go I. But to make sure it is not left up to grace alone, I never touch the thing. When AI results pop up as the default in a search engine, I reject them, rebuke them, as if they contained a dark sorcery that would through mere engagement creep into my synapses and take control.

This monastic, almost paranoid approach is not only because AI is a risky and unreliable research tool. It is a voice, a tone, a frequency. AI language haunts me in a million similar tinny chants from customer care to social media posts to press releases. I worry even as I write this column that it might sound like AI. That I have somehow through relentless exposure assimilated its blandness and excess. Its short declarative sentences. Its advertorial narration. Its informal mimicry of personhood. Hi there! Hope all is well. I thought you might be interested in a column about AI, an issue that is increasingly occupying thought leaders and writers. Would you like to learn more?

What are we losing in this fire? Writing is not just about rendering thoughts through words in a certain style: analysis, literary fiction, storytelling. It is about the particular alchemy of a single individual drawing on their own unique profile to construct an idea. It is about the way their brain works, the quirks they have picked up along the way, their politics, their history, their relationships, the very way they see the world. You can produce a thousand Dickenses and Rumis through AI, but you can’t create a new iconic writer. You can only draw on the chorus of styles that already exist. You can only derive, never create.

And then there is the atrophy. The loss of the ability to struggle for a word, to craft a verbal image. I could save precious minutes as a deadline approaches and ask AI to cook me up a nice line, or I could linger and conceptualise that resisting AI writing feels like trying not to inhale an airborne virus. It might not be a great simile, but it’s mine goddamit. And it helps me, in writing, to consolidate what I am thinking. Whether it’s a political text or an email, leaning on AI for everything from research to writing severs the connection between feeling and expression. It drains the colour from everything and suffocates one’s ability to channel and meet and be surprised by what is knocking about in your head. When tech becomes about reducing labour in every way, it ends up becoming an inhibitor of actual consciousness. Entirely unsurprising research shows that leaning on LLMs may reduce brain engagement.

Even more depressing is how well suited this cauterisation of the self is to the political moment, one of a glut of content and bad information. AI is rampant on social media, where accounts authoritatively post long texts on everything from the wars in the Middle East to dramatic personal experiences that didn’t happen in a sort of reality fan-fiction. And in politics, where... READ MORE  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/01/ai-meaning-humanity-political-moment-trust-humans-over-machines

   [AS ALWAYS PLEASE GO TO THE LINK TO READ GOOD ARTICLES (or quotes or watch videos) IN FULL: HELP SHAPE ALGORITHMS (and conversations) THAT EMPOWER DECENCY, DIGNITY, JUSTICE & PEACE... and hopefully Palestine]  

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

My letter to the NTimes RE "West Bank Land, Empty but Full of Meaning "

Khaled al-Saidi, right, said his family bought land in E1, between East Jerusalem and Maale Adumim, in the 1990s. The Israelis have told him to leave. Rina Castelnuovo for The New York Times
RE: West Bank Land, Empty but Full of Meaning
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/world/middleeast/e1-on-west-bank-is-empty-but-full-of-meaning.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_ee_20121218&_r=0

Dear Editor,

A person might be very tempted to usurp an 'empty' patch of their neighbor's yard, but clearly such a move crosses a line, a legal and a moral line:  Israel knows that West Bank E1 land is Palestinian land and yet is intentionally crossing a crucially important line and then obfuscating so as to more easily continue on with the nefarious practice of demolishing Palestinian homes, pulverizing Palestinian communities and pushing even more Palestinians into poverty, forced exile, and despair.... and extremism.

Israel is also pushing its own citizens into extremism and religious bigotry with its anti-Palestinian/anti-Palestine policies.  Full sovereign respect for international law, basic human rights, and real democracy would go a long way towards calming down the situation and laying the ground work for fair and just negotiations to finally and completely end the Israel-Palestine conflict with a fully secular two state solution.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab

NOTES
Raja Shehadeh reflects on the UN resolution to recognise Palestine as a non-member observer state

Human Rights Day 2012: Palestine refugees and human rights

12-12-12 National Geographic photo of the day: Art Student, Jerusalem 1926.

Beyond the UN vote: New futures for Palestine and Israel: The Israelis and Palestinians are not as far apart as experts make them out to be. All issues are resolvable if there is vision, intentionality and political will.
 
Israel's Jewish extremists vandalize Jerusalem monastery


Israeli authorities 'to demolish West Bank road'


Israeli separation wall threatens world heritage site of Battir's ancient terraces
 
Gaza: 'My child was killed and nothing has changed'

Mesha’al oils Israel’s propaganda machine with his statement


At Hamas’s anniversary celebration in Gaza last week, the organization’s Politburo leader Khaled Meshaal delivered one of the most cynical, damaging and dangerous speeches in the history of the Palestinian national movement

They Call It Victory
 
Almond Blossoms and Beyond

Israel's education ministry 'suspends program' over Palestinian novel


Palestinian Artist Khaled Jarrar Chips Away at the Wall

Raising Peace

Israel must develop a clearer vision not only for the interests and aspirations of the Palestinians but also for its own long-term survival


It is urgent for both sides of this conflict to understand that their best interests lie in coming to an agreement that will make them both better off. 
  I Am From ... a poem by Saba Abu Zaanona



Israel is not the only country in the region that has either restricted the rights of or discriminated against Palestinians



The Golden Rule... Do unto others as you would have them do unto you

The Arab Peace Initiative


"Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home - so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world." Eleanor Roosevelt

The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/)   Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countries

".... it being clearly understood that nothing
          shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
          rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."