[AS
ALWAYS
PLEASE GO TO THE LINK
TO READ GOOD ARTICLES IN
FULL: HELP SHAPE
ALGORITHMS (and
conversations) THAT EMPOWER
DECENCY, DIGNITY, JUSTICE &
PEACE... and hopefully Palestine]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ziad-j-asali-md/one-state-solution-israel_b_1638550.html
President, American Task Force on Palestine
The supporters of the two-state solution are often told that this
vision is unrealistic and has become unachievable. Young, idealistic
seekers of justice and equality are increasingly offering what they
claim is a more "realistic" solution: a single state for all Israelis
and Palestinians, including refugees.
Because I am deeply aware of the difficulties of achieving a lasting
solution through two states living side-by-side in peace, I am always
eager to examine other options. In sincerely evaluating the one state
idea, I first reviewed how the two-state concept emerged, assessed the
fundamental realities of the status quo, and posited the series of
questions about how a single state could be achieved.
Beginning with its inception in 1965, the Palestine Liberation
Organization pursued a single state solution. It only accepted Israel
and the two-state solution in 1988 after armed resistance not only
failed to achieve a state, but precipitated a series of calamities for
Palestinians.
The two-state solution also became the official policy of the United
States -- and the world as represented by the Middle East Quartet --
under the George W. Bush administration in 2002. It was buttressed by
the Arab Peace Initiative and, in 2009, was even
accepted
by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It is the consensus of
international policy, but is also stymied and forestalled by
international politics, and is losing support and confidence because of
the failure of the negotiating process and expanding settlement
construction.
Whether pursuing two states or a single state, everyone needs to
begin by honestly assessing the status quo as defined by the following
salient facts:
- Israel occupies the Palestinians and their land conquered in 1967.
- Soon the number of Jews and Arabs in territories of mandatory Palestine, between the sea and the river, will be equal.
- The de facto state of Israel already constitutes a one-state reality, but the conflict is not ended.
- Jordan is already another unified, single state that is organically tied to the conflict.
- Both negotiations and "armed resistance" have failed to produce a solution.
- Demographics, and land occupancy, are inexorably changing, according to their own logic and pace.
Among Palestinians, the one-state idea is embraced mainly by those
most opposed to Israel, Zionism, normalization, negotiations, cultural
exchange and trade, and who support boycott, divesture and sanctions.
To take the one-state option seriously, due diligence regarding its
feasibility is required. This simply means asking how it can be achieved
through the following questions:
1) What is the mechanism for negotiating, implementing or imposing such a solution? ....
READ MORE