"The great American environmentalist Dana Meadows, when asked if
it was too late to do anything about climate change, used to
say, “We have exactly enough time — starting now.” The Arab
world has exactly enough time — starting now. If people do not
stop fighting with each other over dead ideologies and sectarian
differences and focus instead on overcoming their deficits of
knowledge, freedom and women’s empowerment — as the U.N. Arab
Human Development Report urged — there is no hope. As Qaid
suggested, in Yemen those old ideologies are luxuries now. It is
just about water." Postcard From Yemen By Thomas L. Friedman May 7, 2013
Labels
- Notes (4094)
- Palestine (3578)
- letters (861)
- America (692)
- Human Rights (514)
- Ibrahim's Estate (503)
- art (228)
- Nakba (162)
- poem (143)
- books (109)
- Gardens (62)
- Non-violence (19)
Thursday, May 9, 2013
“Were you really shot in a fight over water?” He winces out his answer: “It wasn’t about politics. It wasn’t about the Muslim Brotherhood. It was about water.”
Labels:
Dana Meadows,
Marketplace of Ideas,
Middle East Peace,
Notes,
NYTimes,
Thomas Friedman,
water,
Yemen
Former Palestinian fighter now battles for a middle path: Palestinian Mohammed Dajani, from a prominent Jerusalem family, has become a vocal advocate for pragmatism and peace.
![]() |
Palestinian
Mohammed Dajani's staircase in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Beit
Hanina is a literal paper trail of his family and career, from an
Ottoman sultan's decree that gave his relatives custodianship of David's
tomb to the photos just behind him of then-Senator Barack Obama
visiting his Al Quds University classroom.
Christa Case Bryant/TCSM
|
Wasatia: Quranic term for “moderation” or “balance,” aims to give a voice to
what Dajani considers a majority of Palestinians who want to work for
statehood through nonviolent means but get drowned out by increasing
radicalization on both sides.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/Olive-Press/2013/0508/Former-Palestinian-fighter-now-battles-for-a-middle-path?nav=107-csm_subcategory-leadStory
By Christa Case Bryant, Staff writer / May 8, 2013 East Jerusalem
By his own admission, Mohammed Dajani was “extremely radical” as a young man working for the Palestinian militant group Fatah in Lebanon.
His family was forced to leave their stately Jerusalem home during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. Following the example set by his grandfather, who ripped up the refugee card given to his wife, Mr. Dajani has refused to label himself a refugee: “We are citizens and human beings and we have to earn our way,” he says.
But as a young man he saw no other solution than taking back all of historic Palestine from the Israelis.
“I believed that it was us or them and that the only solution was to liberate our land,” he says. “And if we did not have the power to do that, we should do what Samson did and bring down the temple on everyone’s head,” he says, referring to the biblical story of a Hebrew prisoner who killed 3,000 people, including himself, when he removed the central pillars of a Philistine temple.
After that, however, he went to the US to get a PhD; getting some distance from the conflict changed his outlook dramatically and he began working for peace.
Those efforts crystallized into a new initiative after he witnessed a standoff at an Israeli checkpoint near his home. Palestinians who wanted to pray in Jerusalem amassed at the checkpoint, but Israeli guards initially refused to let them pass. Eventually they worked out a deal – the Palestinians were allowed to pass...READ MORE
Labels:
balance,
Christian Science Monitor,
CSM,
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
humanity,
Mohammed Dajani,
Notes,
Wasatia
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Palestine now recognised by greater power than US or Israel – Google
3 May 2013:
Internet giant follows UN in recognising statehood, changing home page tagline from 'Palestinian territories' to 'Palestine'
Labels:
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
GOOGLE,
Notes,
Palestine
Saturday, May 4, 2013
My letter to the NYTimes RE One Step Forward, The Arab League offers an improved proposal for peace in the Middle East, a welcome announcement.
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the
foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world...
![]() |
| In 1950, on the second anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, students at the UN International Nursery School in New York viewed a poster of the historic document. After adopting it on December 10, 1948, the UN General Assembly had called upon all Member States to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories." (UN Photo) |
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/opinion/one-step-forward-for-the-israelis-and-palestinians.html?ref=global
Dear Editor,
In 1948, Martin Luther Kings was fifteen years away from articulating "I have a dream" making America a more real democracy.
In 1948, after the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust, the idea of creating a country called Israel specifically as a Jewish homeland probably seemed reasonable. That was then, this is now... Now after the longest running refugee crisis in the world today only grows more catastrophic for the native non-Jewish population of the land that Israel currently rules with an iron fist, and now as Islamists clamor to gain power, I think we must conscientiously refuse to underwrite religious tyranny of any type: Taxpayers here and there should not be funding religious 'scholars', settlements and further conflict.
Fair and just laws and respect for universal basic human rights are the tools to keep Jewish people (as well as Muslims and Christians and everyone else) safe, secure, gainfully employed, able active citizens contributing to the common good. Two fully sovereign secular states, one Israel and one Palestine living side by side in peace is the best way forward- for everyone's sake.
Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
NOTES
Fayyad Steps Down, Not Out
The Economist: Squeeze them out... As Jewish settlements expand, the Palestinians are being driven away
'Quiet man' Kerry's strategy for Middle East peace
Vatican urged to act after nuns, landowners lose Israel wall challenge After a seven-year legal battle, a group of Palestinian landowners and Catholic nuns this week lost an appeal against Israel building its separation barrier on their land.
Youth voice hope for change in static Palestinian politics
This Week in Palestine: Palestinian Institutions A Story of Perseverance ... Salam Fayyad "This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance."
Israeli forces uproot 700 olive trees near Jenin
CNN online Dean Obeidallah: I'm Muslim, and I hate terrorism
Hussein Ibish: Fate of Christians will define the Arab future
"I come from there and I have
memories... "
"Legislature should "make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof..." Thomas Jefferson
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
*******
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
".... it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countriesPalestinian Refugees(1948-NOW) refused their right to return... and their right to live in peace free from religious bigotry and injustice.
The
Golden Rule... Do unto others as you would have
them do unto you
"Where, after all,
do universal human rights begin? In small places,
close to home - so close and so small that they
cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they
are the world of the individual person; the
neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he
attends; the factory, farm, or office where he
works. Such are the places where every man, woman,
and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity,
equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these
rights have meaning there, they have little meaning
anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold
them close to home, we shall look in vain for
progress in the larger world." Eleanor Roosevelt
Refugees and the Right of Return
Palestinian
refugees must be given the option to exercise their
right of return (as well as receive compensation for
their losses arising from their dispossession and
displacement) though refugees may prefer other options
such as: (i) resettlement in third countries, (ii)
resettlement in a newly independent Palestine (even
though they originate from that part of Palestine which
became Israel) or (iii) normalization of their legal
status in the host country where they currently reside.
What is important is that individual refugees decide for
themselves which option they prefer – a decision must
not be imposed upon them.
UN Resolution
194 from 1948 : The
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with
their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest
practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the
property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or
damage to property which, under principles of international law
or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or
authorities responsible.
Friday, May 3, 2013
The Economist: Squeeze them out... As Jewish settlements expand, the Palestinians are being driven away
A barrage of reports by the UN, the European Union and assorted
charities has repeatedly warned that the Palestinians in Area C are
under threat. Some 350,000 Jewish settlers now inhabit over 200
settlements and outposts in the same area, usually on the high ground,
twice as many people as the Palestinians in the land below.
Labels:
Exasperating the Israel-Palestine conflict,
forced displacement,
Israel,
Israeli Occupation,
Notes,
Palestine,
The Economist
Thursday, May 2, 2013
My letter to the Washington Post RE Netanyahu cool to Arab land-swap initiative [Kerry this week praised the League for backing land swaps as part of Israeli-Palestinian peace process.]
![]() |
Liberty Enlightening the WorldThe Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World is a universal symbol of freedom and democracy... The statue, a gift to the United States from the people of France, is of a robed female figure representing Libertas, the Roman goddess of freedom, who bears a torch and a tabula ansata (a tablet evoking the law) |
Kerry this week praised the League for backing land swaps as part of Israeli-Palestinian peace process.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/netanyahu-cool-to-arab-land-swap-initiative/2013/05/01/b695449c-b282-11e2-9fb1-62de9581c946_story.htmlDear Editor,
The US State Department has clear goals and priorities- one of the most obvious is to "Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countries" http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/
Palestinians refusing to recognize Israel's right to exist is a very different thing than Palestinians refusing to recognize Israel as Jewish, or as Netanyahu phrases it to "recognize Israel as the national state of the Jewish people".
Israel's Jewishness is none of our business. It is not America's job to define what is Jewish or who is Jewish or where Jewish people should live and who they should be allowed to marry.
Our efforts to help end the Israel-Palestine conflict need to be in line with our ideals. America should not be advocating (or funding) official state religions. Nor should Palestinians be forced to endorse and empower the institutionalized bigotry that already exists in Israel.
A fully secular two state solution to once and for all actually end the Israel-Palestine conflict is the best way forward. Tax payers (here and there) should not be coerced into funding creeds and cults and religious tyranny of any type.
Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
NOTES
'Quiet man' Kerry's strategy for Middle East peace
Vatican urged to act after nuns, landowners lose Israel wall challenge After a seven-year legal battle, a group of Palestinian landowners and Catholic nuns this week lost an appeal against Israel building its separation barrier on their land.
Youth voice hope for change in static Palestinian politics
This Week in Palestine: Palestinian Institutions A Story of Perseverance ... Salam Fayyad "This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance."
Israeli forces uproot 700 olive trees near Jenin
CNN online Dean Obeidallah: I'm Muslim, and I hate terrorism
Hussein Ibish: Fate of Christians will define the Arab future
"I
come from there and I have memories... "
"Legislature
should "make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."
Thomas Jefferson
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
*******
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
".... it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countriesPalestinian Refugees(1948-NOW) refused their right to return... and their right to live in peace free from religious bigotry and injustice.
The
Golden Rule... Do unto others as you would have
them do unto you
"Where, after all,
do universal human rights begin? In small places,
close to home - so close and so small that they
cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they
are the world of the individual person; the
neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he
attends; the factory, farm, or office where he
works. Such are the places where every man, woman,
and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity,
equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these
rights have meaning there, they have little
meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action
to uphold them close to home, we shall look in
vain for progress in the larger world."
Eleanor Roosevelt
Refugees
and the Right of Return
Palestinian
refugees must be given the option to exercise their
right of return (as well as receive compensation for
their losses arising from their dispossession and
displacement) though refugees may prefer other options
such as: (i) resettlement in third countries, (ii)
resettlement in a newly independent Palestine (even
though they originate from that part of Palestine
which became Israel) or (iii) normalization of their
legal status in the host country where they currently
reside. What is important is that individual refugees
decide for themselves which option they prefer – a
decision must not be imposed upon them.
UN Resolution 194 from 1948 :
The
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace
with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the
earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be
paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for
loss of or damage to property which, under principles of
international law or in equity, should be made good by the
Governments or authorities responsible.
Labels:
America,
Democracy,
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
freedom,
Israel,
letters,
Palestine
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
My letters 4-21, 4-24 & 5-1-2013 RE Salam Fayyad's state building efforts & The Arab Peace Initiative
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0430/Kerry-makes-headway-with-Middle-East-peace-but-violence-flares?nav=87-frontpage-entryNineItem
Dear Editor,
The Arab Peace Initiative is sensible, realistic and an admirable first firm step towards actually ending the Israel-Palestine conflict and all the many negative ramifications created by that conflict.
Kudos to all who are courageous and compassionate enough to help shape and sustain a just and lasting peace with real security for all, regardless of supposed race or religion.
Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
NOTES
This Week in Palestine: Palestinian Institutions A Story of Perseverance ... Salam Fayyad "This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance."
Israeli forces uproot 700 olive trees near Jenin
CNN online Dean Obeidallah: I'm Muslim, and I hate terrorism
Hussein Ibish: Fate of Christians will define the Arab future
"I come from there and I have memories... "
*******
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
".... it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countriesPalestinian Refugees(1948-NOW) refused their right to return... and their right to live in peace free from religious bigotry and injustice.
The
Golden Rule... Do unto others as you would have
them do unto you
"Where, after all,
do universal human rights begin? In small places,
close to home - so close and so small that they
cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they
are the world of the individual person; the
neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he
attends; the factory, farm, or office where he
works. Such are the places where every man, woman,
and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity,
equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these
rights have meaning there, they have little
meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action
to uphold them close to home, we shall look in
vain for progress in the larger world."
Eleanor Roosevelt
Refugees
and the Right of Return
Palestinian
refugees must be given the option to exercise
their right of return (as well as receive
compensation for their losses arising from their
dispossession and displacement) though refugees
may prefer other options such as: (i) resettlement
in third countries, (ii) resettlement in a newly
independent Palestine (even though they originate
from that part of Palestine which became Israel)
or (iii) normalization of their legal status in
the host country where they currently reside.
What is important is that individual refugees
decide for themselves which option they prefer – a
decision must not be imposed upon them.
UN Resolution 194 from 1948
: The
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at
peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so
at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation
should be paid for the property of those choosing not to
return and for loss of or damage to property which, under
principles of international law or in equity, should be
made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.
*************
RE: Goodbye to All That by Thomas L. Friedman
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/24/opinion/friedman-goodbye-to-all-that.html
Dear Editor,
There are many nails in the coffin of the two-state solution and the cherished dream of a free Palestine.... and the cherished dream of a just and lasting peace here there and everywhere.
The insulting assertion by some that Fayyad was a "stooge" for America helps hate mongering anti-Palestine activists and agent provocateurs lay the groundwork for mainstream America and our leadership to become even more alienated from Palestine.
Anti-America rhetoric has serious ramifications beyond merely hurting the feelings of Americans, and jeopardizing future funding of Middle East state building efforts and UNWRA.
Anti-America rhetoric, as well as anti-Israel rhetoric, fuels terrorism... " What makes young men, in the prime of their lives, believe that killing others, including at a sports event, is some kind of sacred duty? And can they really identify with an imaginary "nation," one that transcends boundaries and ethnicities, no less? And what will it take to make people on all four corners of earth unite in putting an end to this barbaric pattern and bringing such young men to their senses?" Hassan Khader: Mourning Martin Richard
Fayyad was good for Palestine, not only because of his non-corrupt, institution-focused leadership, but also because he was a darn good diplomat and role model.
Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
NOTES
"When concepts such as democracy, secularism and liberalism are stigmatized and discredited as products of an alien and hostile culture, their Arab advocates are crippled from the outset... A basic decision needs to be made. We can resign ourselves to downplaying and shortchanging these concepts. Or we can reassert and redefine them by demonstrating in practical terms how these values -- along with our system of entrepreneurship -- have informed American success and are fueling growth and progress around the world." Dr. Ziad Asali
April 15, 2013
At
Cornell, Panelists Call for Solution to Conflict in Middle
East
Hussein Ibish: Fate of Christians will define the Arab future: "States will become, at best, merely the geographical battlegrounds and, at worst, the principal weapons of repression between battling groups of intolerant religious fanatics."
Gifts of Glass
Our words have a way of echoing out into either war or peace....
Growing Gardens for Palestine: Nominating a hero
"Resuscitating the peace process"...excellent cartoon from the Baltimore Sun
HEAR PEACE - SEE PEACE - SPEAK PEACE.... be peace
Crowdsourcing Peace: By going over the heads of Israeli and Palestinian leaders, Obama is demanding that their people step up.
"Legislature
should "make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof..." Thomas Jefferson
The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Refugees
and the Right of Return
Hussein Ibish: Fate of Christians will define the Arab future: "States will become, at best, merely the geographical battlegrounds and, at worst, the principal weapons of repression between battling groups of intolerant religious fanatics."
Gifts of Glass
Our words have a way of echoing out into either war or peace....
Growing Gardens for Palestine: Nominating a hero
"Resuscitating the peace process"...excellent cartoon from the Baltimore Sun
HEAR PEACE - SEE PEACE - SPEAK PEACE.... be peace
Crowdsourcing Peace: By going over the heads of Israeli and Palestinian leaders, Obama is demanding that their people step up.
*******
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
"The only way to honor our tragic histories is to create a future for our children free of man-made tragedy. This means making peace fully, completely and without reservation, between Israel and Palestine." ATFP's Ziad Asali: To honor a tragic history, we must work for peace
".... it being clearly understood that nothing
shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious
rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine..."
What
is an Israeli settlement The Office of International Religious Freedom ( http://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/) Given the U.S. commitment to religious freedom, and to the international covenants that guarantee it as the inalienable right of every human being, the United States seeks to:
Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countriesPalestinian Refugees(1948-NOW) refused their right to return... and their right to live in peace free from religious bigotry and injustice.
The Golden
Rule... Do unto others as you would have
them do unto you
"Where, after all, do universal human rights
begin? In small places, close to home - so
close and so small that they cannot be seen on
any maps of the world. Yet they are the world
of the individual person; the neighborhood he
lives in; the school or college he attends;
the factory, farm, or office where he works.
Such are the places where every man, woman,
and child seeks equal justice, equal
opportunity, equal dignity without
discrimination. Unless these rights have
meaning there, they have little meaning
anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to
uphold them close to home, we shall look in
vain for progress in the larger world."
Eleanor Roosevelt
Palestinian refugees must be given the option
to exercise their right of return (as well as
receive compensation for their losses arising
from their dispossession and displacement)
though refugees may prefer other options such
as: (i) resettlement in third countries, (ii)
resettlement in a newly independent Palestine
(even though they originate from that part of
Palestine which became Israel) or (iii)
normalization of their legal status in the
host country where they currently reside.
What is important is that individual refugees
decide for themselves which option they prefer
– a decision must not be imposed upon them.
UN Resolution 194 from 1948
: The refugees wishing to return to their homes
and live at peace with their neighbours should be
permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date,
and that compensation should be paid for the property
of those choosing not to return and for loss of or
damage to property which, under principles of
international law or in equity, should be made good by
the Governments or authorities responsible.
Emanating from the conviction of the Arab countries that a military solution to the conflict will not achieve peace or provide security for the parties, the council:
1. Requests Israel to reconsider its policies and
declare that a just peace is its strategic option as
well.
2. Further calls upon Israel to affirm:
I- Full Israeli withdrawal from all the territories occupied since 1967, including the Syrian Golan Heights, to the June 4, 1967 lines as well as the remaining occupied Lebanese territories in the south of Lebanon.II- Achievement of a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem to be agreed upon in accordance with U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194.III- The acceptance of the establishment of a sovereign independent Palestinian state on the Palestinian territories occupied since June 4, 1967 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
3. Consequently, the Arab countries affirm the
following:
I- Consider the Arab-Israeli conflict ended, and enter into a peace agreement with Israel, and provide security for all the states of the region.II- Establish normal relations with Israel in the context of this comprehensive peace.
4. Assures the rejection of all forms of Palestinian
patriation which conflict with the special circumstances
of the Arab host countries.
5. Calls upon the government of Israel and all Israelis
to accept this initiative in order to safeguard the
prospects for peace and stop the further shedding of
blood, enabling the Arab countries and Israel to live in
peace and good neighbourliness and provide future
generations with security, stability and prosperity.
6. Invites the international community and all countries
and organisations to support this initiative.
7. Requests the chairman of the summit to form a special
committee composed of some of its concerned member
states and the secretary general of the League of Arab
States to pursue the necessary contacts to gain support
for this initiative at all levels, particularly from the
United Nations, the Security Council, the United States
of America, the Russian Federation, the Muslim states
and the European Union.
**************
I totally appreciate and agree with your pro-Palestine editorial-
and I think that it is a huge shame that so many people sabotaged
and/or scapegoated Fayyad, rather than appreciating his wisdom and
his many positive contributions to Palestine. He is indeed a hero.
Labels:
Chicago Tribune,
CSM,
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
letters,
NYTimes,
The Arab Peace Initiative
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Kerry backs moves to revive Arab peace initiative... Addressing reporters after the talks, he said he had reaffirmed the vision of President Barack Obama of "two states living side-by-side in peace and security, brought about through direct negotiations between the parties."
![]() |
| U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al-Thani deliver a joint statement after a multilateral meeting with the Arab League delegation at the Blair House in Washington, D.C., on April 29, 2013. [State Department photo/ Public Domain] |
[AS
ALWAYS
PLEASE GO TO THE LINK
TO READ GOOD ARTICLES IN
FULL: HELP SHAPE ALGORITHMS (and
conversations) THAT EMPOWER
DECENCY, DIGNITY, JUSTICE &
PEACE... and hopefully Palestine]
WASHINGTON (AFP) -- US Secretary of State John Kerry made a fresh push Monday to relaunch the moribund Middle East peace process, meeting top Arab League officials in a bid to revive a decade-old Saudi plan.
Far from the cameras, the new top US diplomat held talks with senior ministers from the Arab League, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the Palestinian territories to discuss the Arab Peace Initiative.
The ministers, meeting in the privacy of Blair House just a stone's throw from the White House, were also joined by Vice President Joe Biden, for what Kerry called a "very positive, very constructive discussion."
Since taking office on February 1, Kerry has plunged into the maelstrom of Arab-Israeli politics hoping to break an impasse and resume the vital Palestinian-Israeli talks which collapsed in late 2010.
After his discussions, he praised "the Arab League's very important role... in bringing about a peace in the Middle East, and specifically by reaffirming the Arab Peace Initiative here... with a view to ending the conflict."
Kerry has suggested the Arab Peace Initiative -- unveiled in 2002 by Saudi King Abdullah in which 22 Arab countries would normalize ties with Israel in return for Israeli withdrawal from occupied lands -- could provide a framework.
Addressing reporters after the talks, he said he had reaffirmed the vision of President Barack Obama of "two states living side-by-side in peace and security, brought about through direct negotiations between the parties."
Kerry has already traveled three times to the region, meeting senior Israeli and Palestinian officials, pursuing what he has called "a quiet strategy" in an ambitious bid to revive the talks and achieve a peace treaty which has eluded successive American administrations for decades.
Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim, chair of the Arab Peace Initiative follow-up committee, headed the delegation, which also included Palestinian foreign affairs minister Riyad al-Maliki and Arab League chief Nabil al-Arabi.
"Peace between the Palestinians and the Israelis ... is a strategic choice for the Arab states," Jassim said after the talks.
He agreed that any deal should be based on a two-state solution, with the borders defined by the June 4, 1967 borders, before Israeli troops seized East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
But Jassim backed Obama's proposals for a "comparable and mutual agreed minor swap of the land" between Israelis and Palestinians to reflect the realities of the burgeoning communities on the ground.
Earlier, Jassim had welcomed the talks saying he believed it was "an important meeting, an important era, which we hope will lead to peace, a comprehensive peace between the Arabs and the Israelis."
Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohammed Kamel Amr also attended the talks, along with Bahrain's Foreign Minister Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmed al-Khalifa and top Saudi and Lebanese officials.
The talks came after a "series of productive conversations by the secretary to explore how we can best move regional peace efforts forward," deputy acting State Department spokesman Patrick Ventrell told journalists.
They also focused on new proposals from Kerry to promote economic development on the West Bank -- a scheme in which he is hoping to attract private sector investment to boost Palestinian trust.
Labels:
Arab League,
Arab Peace Initiative,
Diplomacy,
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
Notes,
Obama,
US Secretary of State John Kerry
Saturday, April 27, 2013
This Week in Palestine: Palestinian Institutions A Story of Perseverance ... Salam Fayyad "This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance."
![]() |
| Prime Minister Salam Fayyad inaugurating olive harvest season in Jayyous village, Qalqilia on 10 November 2012. Photo by photojournalist Mustafa Abu Dayya, Office of the Prime Minister. |
Palestinian Institutions A Story of Perseverance
http://www.thisweekinpalestine.com/details.php?id=3981&ed=217&edid=217
By Salam Fayyad
In
late August 2009, the Palestinian government introduced a
state-building plan that set ambitious goals for Palestinian
institutions and sought to arrive at a point of institutional readiness
on a par with established states. This plan included the implementation
of hundreds of projects, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and
other infrastructure. The government also implemented far-reaching
reforms in the financial, judicial, governance, and security sectors
with efficacy.
In conjunction with the reforms and state-building effort, the government decreased its reliance on outside assistance by 60 percent in five years, in relation to the GDP, by improving tax collection and enacting serious fiscal reform, as well as creating the legal and institutional framework to encourage private-sector-led development. In addition, per capita income returned, in real terms, to its pre-2000 levels. In other words, the Palestinian economy recovered from the output losses sustained as a direct consequence of the tightening of Israeli restrictions during the years of the second Intifada.
But conceptually, the significance of this enterprise lay in the translation of the Palestinian political context and agenda into reality by building efficient, accountable, and responsible institutions of the state that can provide citizens with the best services possible, despite the limited means.
This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance.
In conjunction with the reforms and state-building effort, the government decreased its reliance on outside assistance by 60 percent in five years, in relation to the GDP, by improving tax collection and enacting serious fiscal reform, as well as creating the legal and institutional framework to encourage private-sector-led development. In addition, per capita income returned, in real terms, to its pre-2000 levels. In other words, the Palestinian economy recovered from the output losses sustained as a direct consequence of the tightening of Israeli restrictions during the years of the second Intifada.
But conceptually, the significance of this enterprise lay in the translation of the Palestinian political context and agenda into reality by building efficient, accountable, and responsible institutions of the state that can provide citizens with the best services possible, despite the limited means.
This was not about roads, buildings, or infrastructure, despite their importance. This plan was about statehood, citizen participation, and enfranchisement. It was based on the vision of establishing a functional framework where government is accountable and citizens participate in the widest and most effective way possible in decision-making and governance.
As political and diplomatic efforts were to advance the political agenda to end the occupation and establish a sovereign state on the land Israel occupied in 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, the government was to create the needed institutional framework to carry out the responsibilities of a full-fledged sovereign state.
This vision, with all that it entailed by way of self-imposed benchmarks and priorities, was not adopted because its elements were prerequisites to Palestinian statehood. The right to live as free people, with dignity, in a country of our own, is an absolute, natural, and national right of the Palestinian people that enjoys unanimous recognition from the international community. We unilaterally set these goals in order to create institutions capable of performing to the satisfaction of our public and in a manner worthy of their sacrifices in our long struggle for freedom. The concept was to create enough positive momentum to push the world to take practical steps to help end the occupation, which would enable us to fulfil our potential and enjoy our right to live in our sovereign state.
The State of Palestine is now a regional leader in the areas of fiscal transparency, fighting corruption, and social assistance programmes. In the public sector, women have taken their rightful position in leadership and decision-making positions, including the police and judiciary. Women also head significant and world-acclaimed public institutions, such as the Central Bureau of Statistics and the Capital Market Authority, and for the first time, a woman became a Governor and six women assumed key cabinet positions, and in the process, made the Palestinian government, at least in this sense, the most progressive in the region.
In line with these institutional achievements, the level of international awareness and engagement rose. Countries and regional blocs, such as the European Union, adopted progressive positions regarding occupied East Jerusalem and Palestinian statehood.
Of equal significance, the international donor community adopted the Palestinian government’s development priorities, affirming its commitment to investing in areas classified as C, which make up more than 60 percent of the West Bank, and supporting Palestinian development and perseverance in East Jerusalem. This supports our standing position: that such development efforts are essential to contributing to rolling back the occupation and realising Palestinian sovereignty.
These international positions and actions, among others, are steps in the right direction because they align policy with practice and bring both into harmony with international law and the standing legal and moral obligations that states have towards enabling us to establish our own state.
Two years ago, the international community recognised our efforts and stated unanimously that Palestine boasts the institutions of a functional, established state. In addition to this recognition, the international community and specialised agencies also recognised what we have affirmed all along: in order for us to protect what we have achieved thus far and develop further, as is our right, the Israeli occupation must end.
The punishing, unnatural condition of living under an oppressive occupation denies us our inalienable right to live in a free country of our own, empowered to develop our lives and economy to their full potential. That has been our message all along and for the past two years, it has been the world’s standing position.
Ironically, around the time we succeeded in getting world recognition of our institutional readiness for statehood in early 2011, the Palestinian economy was beginning to suffer the ill effects of financial difficulties, which subsequently turned into a deep financial crisis. This was due to a shortfall in foreign aid and it was further vastly complicated by Israel’s withholding of our tax revenues.
Sadly and wrongly, some claimed that the ensuing failure on the part of the government to meet its financial obligations on time reflected a lack of readiness for statehood. I say “wrongly” because this claim disregards the fact that sovereign and developed states that have been around for centuries could face, and in fact have faced, serious economic and financial crises. But in no way and at no point did such financial crises form a basis for asserting that any one of these countries no longer qualified for statehood.
In our case, we said all along that a distinction needs to be made between lack of functionality due to financial difficulties, on the one hand, and lack of institutional capacity causing dysfunction, on the other. I maintain that the financial difficulties we have faced and continue to face in no way detract from our institutional readiness, which has been acknowledged universally, including in the landmark resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly last November.
For despite the deep financial crisis and the government’s inability to meet its financial obligations towards its employees and partners on time, Palestinian institutions exhibited resilience and determination. Our institutions continued to provide vital services to the public, despite disruptions and unrest, including a devastating storm, the likes of which Palestine had not seen in six decades.
This crisis risked striking at the Palestinian spirit, which insists on building and moving forward towards freedom. It risked implanting despair and frustration as well as paralysing the functional and accountable institutions that Palestinians have built. That must not be allowed to happen. We are determined to protect our right to establish a sovereign state whose institutions are ready and capable to tap into the potential we have been unjustly denied as a people.
Palestinians have a long and prosperous history of entrepreneurship and success that often seems to be achieved against all odds. As far back as the mid-1800s, Palestinian educators, artists, journalists, philanthropists, and entrepreneurs made an indelible imprint on their fields in the region and worldwide. Since the Nakba 65 years ago, our resilience and innate optimism have been key to our people’s survival and perseverance. And while the reality of occupation and the absence of a political horizon inevitably cause frustration and may even produce despair, they cannot in our case lead to a sense of surrender to circumstance or defeat.
The State of Palestine will materialise. This is an historic inevitability whose achievement we, as a people, have helped accelerate by staying steadfast and deeply rooted in our homeland, building where the occupation demolishes and planting where it uproots.
Institution building in Palestine was and will continue to be about reflecting our people’s unassailable spirit and determination to realise and enjoy freedom and provide them with nothing less than what they rightly deserve: excellence. That is why it is a continuing effort, one that can and will withstand adversity. This is an endeavour motivated by the most powerful and universal of all ideas: freedom and our natural right to enjoy it.
His Excellency Salam Fayyad is Prime Minister of the State of Palestine.
Labels:
citizen participation,
Ending the Israel/Palestine conflict,
enfranchisement,
Notes,
Palestine,
Peace,
positive ideals,
Salam Fayyad,
security,
statehood
Israeli forces uproot 700 olive trees near Jenin
NABLUS (Ma'an) -- Israeli forces on Thursday uprooted over 700 olive trees near Arraba village in the northern West Bank, Palestinian Legislative Council member Najah Abu Bakr said.
The trees belonged to Palestinians in Arraba, south of Jenin, close to the Israeli settlement Mevo Dotan, the MP said in a statement.
On Tuesday, Israeli forces destroyed over 1,300 olive trees in the south Hebron hills of the southern West Bank.
Labels:
Israel-Palestine conflict,
Notes,
Olive Trees
Thursday, April 25, 2013
CNN online Dean Obeidallah: I'm Muslim, and I hate terrorism
![]() |
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/24/opinion/obeidallah-muslims-hate-terrorism/index.html
Wed April 24, 2013
Editor's note: Dean
Obeidallah, a former attorney, is a political comedian and frequent
commentator on various TV networks including CNN. He is the co-director
of the upcoming documentary "The Muslims Are Coming!" and co-host of a new CNN podcast "The Big Three" that looks at the top three stories of the week. Follow him on Twitter @deanofcomedy.
I'm not going to tell
you, "Islam is a religion of peace." Nor will I tell you that Islam is a
religion of violence. What I will say is that Islam is a religion that,
like Christianity and Judaism, is intended to bring you closer to God.
And sadly we have seen people use the name of each of these Abrahamic
faiths to wage and justify violence.
The unique problem for
Muslims is that our faith is being increasingly defined by the actions
of a tiny group of morally bankrupt terrorists. Just to be clear: The
people who commit violence in the name of Islam are not Muslims, they
are murderers. Their true religion is hatred and inhumanity.
The only people
terrorists speak for are themselves and the others involved in their
despicable plot. They do not represent me, my family or any other Muslim
I know. And believe me, I know a lot of Muslims.
We hate these terrorists
more than non-Muslims do. How can I say that? Because they harm innocent
people in the name of our religion and consequently we suffer a
backlash because of their acts. It can be anything from a spike in hate
crimes to people viewing Muslims as less than fully American because of
our faith. We are the ones called to answer for the sins of people we
detest.
Since the Boston bombing
has renewed for some concerns about Muslims, I wanted to candidly answer
three questions I have been asked repeatedly over the years...READ MORE
Labels:
CNN,
Dean Obeidallah,
mainstream thought,
Marketplace of Ideas,
Muslims,
Notes,
Terrorism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















