Labels

Showing posts with label UN Bid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN Bid. Show all posts

Friday, December 14, 2012

Raja Shehadeh reflects on the UN resolution to recognise Palestine as a non-member observer state

"In my tale, "The Two Djinnis and the Wall", I let loose my imagination and have a Palestinian hiker who has been stopped at an Israeli checkpoint tell of his dreams of a new reality in the region to a female Israeli soldier detaining him while his backpack is being searched. She had claimed she did not understand Arabic, but when he finishes she asks: "Will I ever be able to travel to the places you speak about? My family comes from Aleppo." I hope writers can serve the cause of peace by provoking people's yearning for it. Aren't new realities created by first imagining them, making what is possible in art thinkable in life?"


Palestine: Diary of a historic month

29 November 2012 … Palestinians at a rally in Ramallah. Photograph: APAimages/Rex Features

Friday, December 7, 2012

Israel must develop a clearer vision not only for the interests and aspirations of the Palestinians but also for its own long-term survival

http://jordantimes.com/expressing-solidarity

Jordan Times Editorial: Expressing solidarity

Dec 06, 2012 | 21:47 

 

His Majesty King Abdullah’s visit to Ramallah for talks with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, just after the upgrading of the Palestinian representation at the UN to non-member observer state and the end of a round of fighting between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip, is symbolic.

It also is consistent with the King’s, and Jordan’s, stand in support of the Palestinians who struggle to end the decades-old Israeli occupation.

Few Arab leaders manage to pay official visits to the Palestinian territories to show their solidarity with and support for the Palestinian people. The King’s trip to the West Bank, therefore, sends the message that the Palestinians do not stand alone and that their bid for a two-state solution to their conflict with Israel is the only doable political move.

Jordan was among the first to condemn the recent Israeli decision to expand its settlement construction in and around East Jerusalem; this continuous expansion of illegal Israeli colonies in the West Bank is most counterproductive, and a sure killer of the two-state solution.

Jordan happens to be the closest Arab state to the Palestinians, both geographically and in terms of historical and social ties. The Kingdom stood by the Palestinians for decades, helping them economically, politically and morally.

The special, fraternal relations that bind the peoples of the two banks of the Jordan River are unshakable. The Monarch said Jordan will relentlessly work to see the Palestinians regain their rights and arrive at the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

Israel must develop a clearer vision not only for the interests and aspirations of the Palestinians but also for its own long-term survival.

In the absence of peace, the conflict between the two parties will be kept alive, to their detriment and to that of the entire region.


Associated Press/Majdi Mohammed - King Abdullah II of Jordan, left, gestures during a welcoming ceremony with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, prior to their meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Thursday, Dec. 6, 2012. Jordan’s King Abdullah II has begun a brief visit to the West Bank in support of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ successful bid for U.N. recognition of a state of Palestine. (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed)

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The E1 emergency


The E1 emergency
Hussein Ibish, December 4, 2012
You can't say Israel and United States didn't warn each other, or that they didn't see this coming.
 
The Americans anticipated a potential Israeli overreaction to the Palestinian United Nations status upgrade to "nonmember observer state." And there was one measure they particularly wanted to prevent: new Israeli settlement construction in the hypersensitive E1 corridor near Jerusalem.
 
So a few days before the UN vote, Washington specifically warned Israel not to "retaliate" by building in E1. What was Israel's immediate reaction to the vote? Why, to announce at least 3,000 new settler housing units, including, of course, in E1. And to add, for good measure, that any commitments to the United States not to build there were "no longer relevant." 
 
Building in E1 is among the most damaging steps Israel could take to undermine a two-state solution. E1 threatens to almost cut the West Bank in half. It will completely split occupied East Jerusalem off from the rest of the territory.
 
All serious observers agree with Jerusalem expert Danny Seidemann, who explains, "E-1 is a binary settlement," because "a Palestinian state must be territorially contiguous, with a link to Jerusalem. That is why this is the decisive battle over the feasibility of 'two states for two peoples.'"
 
That is precisely why every American administration has opposed the project since it was first announced in 1999: It's among the few decisive actions either side could take that could finally lead people around the world, especially Israelis and Palestinians, to finally abandon any hope for a two-state solution.
 
More than the withholding of Palestinian tax revenues, which Israel has also decided to do, or even annexing territory (which wouldn't be recognized internationally anyway), building in E1 is among the most aggressive and harmful measures Israel could take in response to the Palestinians' symbolic UN upgrade. E1 construction is anything but symbolic. It transforms the strategic reality very dramatically away from a two-state solution.
  
The reason so many European states shifted their votes at the UN last week in the Palestinian direction is that they have become increasingly concerned the Israeli government isn't interested in a genuine two-state solution. Israel's E1 construction announcement can only serve to heighten these fears. So does the election of an annexationist slate of leaders of the ruling Likud party....READ MORE

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Yesterday's overwhelming vote by UNESCO to recognize Palestine as a full member was far more than a symbolic diplomatic defeat for the United States..

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2011/1101/After-UNESCO-Palestine-vote-could-US-defund-nuclear-watchdog-IAEA-too

"The UN culture and education agency was immediately defunded by the US, which was due to contribute $80 million to the organization this year, a little more than one-fifth of the UN body's budget. The Obama administration's decision was triggered by a 1994 US law that requires financial ties to be cut with any UN agency that accords the Palestinians full membership.

On its face, this may not seem a big deal for America. Ronald Reagan pulled the US out of UNESCO in 1984, and the country only rejoined in the fall of 2002 under George W. Bush, as his administration was courting UN support for military action against Iraq.

But the law that saw the US pull out of UNESCO would apply equally to any other UN agency – whether the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which plays a key role in monitoring nuclear proliferation in states like Iran, or the World Health Organization, where the US and other states intensively coordinate international efforts to deal with public health threats.

And under UN rules, membership into the World Intellectual Property Organization would be more or less automatic at this point if the Palestinians pursue it. The WIPO has been strongly supported by the US, seeking to curb piracy of US movies and software..."


Palestinian school girls walk past a graffiti on a wall depicting UN humanitarian aid supplies, in Gaza City, Monday. Palestine became a full member of the US cultural and educational agency Monday, in a highly divisive move that the United States and other opponents say could harm renewed Mideast peace efforts. Adel Hana/AP

After UNESCO Palestine vote, could US defund nuclear watchdog IAEA, too?

The US withdrew funding after UNESCO's Palestine vote yesterday. There's no reason that Palestinians won't be able to muster the votes for recognition in other UN agencies like the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

France opposes rapid Palestinian bid to join UNESCO

A Palestinian walks past the Church of the Nativity in the West Bank town of Bethlehem. France says it opposes moves by the Palestinian Authority to seek rapid recognition as a full state member of the United Nations cultural organisation UNESCO. (AFP Photo/Hazem Bader)

France said Wednesday that it opposed moves by the Palestinian Authority to seek rapid recognition as a full state member of the United Nations cultural organisation UNESCO.

"We don't think UNESCO is the appropriate arena," foreign ministry spokesman Bernard Valero said, after Arab members of the world body said they wanted the Palestinians to be promoted from observers to full members.

Palestinian leaders have demanded full recognition as a state by the United Nations Security Council in New York -- in the full knowledge that the United States will veto such a move, in support of its ally Israel.

Now their Arab allies in Paris-Based UNESCO have opened up a second front, hoping to add to the growing trappings of Palestinian statehood.

And UNESCO membership would not only be a diplomatic feather in Palestine's cap -- it would allow it to apply to class its monuments as World Heritage Sites at a time when the heritage of much of the Holy Land is under dispute.

France has tried to ply a middle course in the debate, while insisting it fully supports eventual Palestinian statehood in the framework of a two-state solution that guarantees Israel's security and a viable Palestine.

But Valero said France felt it "was not the time" for the Palestinians to push the UNESCO issue, and insisted that the "priority must be the resumption of negotiations" with Israel on an eventual settlement of the dispute.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

The World Council of Churches and member churches around the world sees opportunity for peace in Palestine's UN application

WCC sees opportunity for peace in Palestine's UN application

The WCC has urged strong positive action by the United Nations on behalf of Palestine. While the WCC has advocated justice for Palestinians and Israelis for decades, the United Nations Security Council’s consideration of full membership for Palestine was hailed by the WCC and regional churches as an opportunity for peace.

The World Council of Churches and member churches around the world have pursued peace with justice for both the Palestinian and Israeli peoples for decades. Like much of the international community, we are now watching to see if peace and justice will be served in how the United Nations Security Council and General Assembly process the application of Palestine to become a full member state of the UN.

This request must be considered in the light of numerous resolutions passed at the UN Security Council and General Assembly, supporting a two-state solution. They are the basis for a peace not yet established in a conflict which is also constantly influencing other conflicts in the world. It is now a unique opportunity for the UN to take important decisions to fulfil its role and mandate according to the UN Charter, to make peace with justice prevail between Israelis and Palestinians, and with their neighbours.

Yesterday’s announcement in Israel of plans to build 1,100 more housing units on occupied territory is a stark reminder of why sober deliberation, genuine courage and responsible action by the United Nations are necessary. The United Nations is the voice of the international community in this dispute, a voice that has been raised many times to lay out the basis for an equitable peace between two states.

Negotiations should not be seen as an alternative to the UN acceptance of the Palestinian application for membership. Different initiatives to build stability in the region should go hand in hand.

In the people’s movements across the Arab world peoples are standing up for their freedom and dignity in order to establish democratic states with the rule of law. Now it is appropriate that the United Nations actively supports the establishment of a democratic Palestinian State.

Together with the Heads of Churches in Jerusalem, we “feel the need to intensify the prayers and diplomatic efforts for peace between Palestinians and Israelis, and see that this is the most appropriate time for such an opportunity”.

Related documents

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The Palestinian Statehood Bid - What Comes Next?

"It is evident that the status quo is untenable, the conflict has no military solution, and a negotiated agreement is the only alternative to continued conflict. The Israeli occupation must end and, in turn, Israel must become an accepted member of the community of nations in the Middle East. No Israeli, we hope, wants to occupy another people and no Palestinian, we believe, wants to be occupied. The few benefits the Israelis accrue from occupation (e.g., arable land, settlements, water resources) can be better secured through long-term arrangements with friendly neighboring countries, including a State of Palestine. Real "strategic depth" doesn't come from belligerent occupation. It comes from an end of conflict."

The U.S. was the largest single donor to the Palestinian Authority last year...

... providing $740 million directly and through organizations including UN aid agencies, according to the State Department.
Bloomberg (Analysis)

UN Showdown Ushers in Critical Period for U.S. Middle East Peace Efforts

"It’s significant that the Quartet statement recognized “the achievements of the Palestinian Authority in preparing institutions for statehood” and promised an international donors’ conference to give them “full and sustained support,” said Hussein Ibish, a senior fellow at the American Task Force on Palestine, a Washington group that advocates a two-state solution"

Who Recognizes Palestine?

The Palestinians, who have suffered decades of displacement, dispossessions, and the systematic denial of their national and human rights, have yet to realize their independent state.

CSM: One Gaza family celebrates Palestinian statehood bid despite Hamas ban

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/0925/One-Gaza-family-celebrates-Palestinian-statehood-bid-despite-Hamas-ban

One Gazan couple named their daughter after the month during which Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas presented his request for Palestinian statehood to the United Nations.

By Kristen Chick, Correspondent / September 25, 2011

Though it was forbidden to celebrate President Mahmoud Abbas's request to the UN for recognition of a Palestinian state, the parents of Ayloul Abu Asser celebrated by naming their girl Ayloul, meaning September. Kristen Chick/The Christian Science Monitor

Gaza City, Gaza

When Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas went to the United Nations to ask for recognition of a Palestinian state Friday, Gaza residents weren’t allowed to celebrate in the streets like Palestinians in the West Bank.

Yet one Gazan family found its own way to celebrate. They named their newborn daughter after the occasion. Ayloul Abu Asser was born Sept. 21, as the UN General Assembly was preparing for Mr. Abbas’s request. It was also the same day that Gaza’s Hamas government, a political rival of Mr. Abbas’s Fatah faction, announced that public celebrations of the statehood bid were forbidden.

That didn’t stop Hamad Nasr Abu Asser and Reda Abu Asser from naming their daughter after the month during which Abbas presented his request. Ayloul is the Arabic name for September.

“Hamas prevented any action in the street, so we decided to celebrate in our own way,” says Hamad, Ayloul’s father. The couple supports Fatah, and are were hopeful that Abbas’s speech may bring their dream of statehood closer.

And their daughter’s unusual name is not just a celebration of the occasion, but also a reminder. They hope that Ayloul will be able to grow up in an independent Palestinian state. But if that doesn’t happen, she will keep the dream alive for the next generation.

“If we don’t establish a state, her generation will carry on the project,” says Reda, Ayloul’s mother. Her baby is wrapped in a Palestinian kuffeiyah, and wears a headband in the black, white, and green of the Palestinian flag.

“One day she will ask why her name is Ayloul,”...READ MORE

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

My letter to Obama (etc): Diplomatic efforts regarding ending the Israel/Palestine conflict once and for all, with a just and lasting peace.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?id=3181&letter_id=7379907141&content_dir=congressorg
Subject: Diplomatic efforts regarding ending the Israel/Palestine conflict once and for all, with a just and lasting peace.

Dear President Obama,

Please tell Hilary Clinton (and any one else you know who weighs in on the Israel/Palestine conflict) that Jerusalem is not yet the official capital of Israel: The international community does not recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital and the city hosts no foreign embassies.

Zionists and their supporters like to say "Jerusalem" as short hand for Israel's diplomatic efforts, while referring to Palestine's diplomatic efforts as "Ramallah". What is good for the goose really should be good for the gander. Either also say Jerusalem (or perhaps East Jerusalem) for Palestine's diplomatic efforts, acknowledging both Israel and Palestine's claims, or use the more diplomatic "Tel-Aviv & Ramallah" as short hand for the two sides.

Furthermore, please do all you can to try to help end the Israel/Palestine conflict by supporting the emergence of a fully sovereign Palestinian state. Not a prison camp for the native non-Jewish population of the Holy Land but a real nation state where people are free and respected citizens.

Yes, I know direct negotiations between the two parties are the only way to actually end the Israel/Palestine conflict, but we can all do our part to help calm things down by better understanding the actual conflict, and taking care not to exasperate existing tensions with what we say and do.

The proposed American veto of Palestine's UN Bid is already being used to fuel angry anti-American rhetoric and many distracting commentaries and conjectures. All the world is watching- and the very real plight of the persecuted, impoverished and displaced Palestinians continues to grow more and more dire.

Did you listen carefully to Abbas' UN Bid speech.... Hussein Ibish of the American Task Force on Palestine did and he sums it up quite well in a recent article by pointing out that: "Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’ moving speech before the United Nations General Assembly on Friday was certainly the high point of his career. His address will be forever remembered because Abbas was able to do what no Palestinian leader has ever done in the past: make the moral case for Palestinian independence in a clear, coherent, reasonable manner at the highest international forum." http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArticleDetails.aspx?ID=315757

Ibish wisely keeps his eye on the ball and concludes "Now is the time to move beyond the theatrics at the UN and return to what is achievable. This means continuing to build the basis of a Palestinian state through international support and providing funding for institution-building. It also means serious work by all parties to lay the groundwork for successful negotiations, so that domestic political dynamics in the key societies involved can be aligned with their stated policies of seeking a genuine two-state solution."

A fully secular two state solution to once and for all end the Israel/Palestine conflict really is a worthy goal and an excellent investment- for everyone's sake.

Sincerely,
Anne Selden Annab
American homemaker & poet

NOTES
Help Build A Golden Rule Peace for the Holy Land

GROWING GARDENS FOR PALESTINE

The Arab Peace Initiative


"Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home - so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person; the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm, or office where he works. Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination. Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere. Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world." Eleanor Roosevelt

"Palestinian refugees must be given the option to exercise their right of return (as well as receive compensation for their losses arising from their dispossession and displacement) though refugees may prefer other options such as: (i) resettlement in third countries, (ii) resettlement in a newly independent Palestine (even though they originate from that part of Palestine which became Israel) or (iii) normalization of their legal status in the host country where they currently reside. What is important is that individual refugees decide for themselves which option they prefer – a decision must not be imposed upon them." http://plodelegation.us/palestine/core-issues/

Monday, September 26, 2011

One Step Closer to Palestine By Joharah Baker for MIFTAH

The high felt by Palestinians everywhere as President Mahmoud Abbas held up his application for full membership at the UN last week is long overdue. The elation was well deserved for more than one reason. For one, Palestinians saw before them a man – usually deemed as weak – defy the world’s strongest nation and paint a portrait of Israel’s occupation that was by any standards, the closest picture to reality than we’ve heard for a long time.

Another reason was that Palestinians were basking in the fact that for the first time in years, their leadership was taking proactive measures instead of waiting for someone else to call the shots. The UN bid, whether it reaps any tangible results or not – was our bid, our decision and our move. That is something we can be proud of.

Alas, as sobriety sets in the “morning after”, there is much more to consider besides the satisfying performance of the president before the UN General Assembly. The prospect of membership in the United Nations is an appealing one, no doubt – first and foremost because it puts Palestine on the same level as the world’s nations – but also because it will give us the opportunity to hold Israel accountable for at least some of the ills it has caused us for so many years. Palestine – our state among states – will also be recognized as an occupied country, which believe it or not is a feat in itself. If a vote goes through, there will (hopefully) be no talk of “disputed lands” but of an occupied Palestine on which illegal settlements are built.

That is still a far off destination, but if the leadership does what it says, it is a one-way street from here. The first step has been taken, so to say, which is standing up to the United States, Israel and a considerable number of other countries that have been trying to talk Abbas out of the bid for months.

Nonetheless, we should not get ahead of ourselves, something we Palestinians tend to do in times like these. While Abbas did tell the adoring crowds that “The journey is long and there are many obstacles,” this did not put a damper on the thousands who would hail him as a hero.

All Palestinians, regardless of where they live, dream and hope for freedom and an independent state in their rightful homeland. We are all in consensus that peace and Israel’s occupation cannot coexist and peace will never come without justice for the Palestinians. President Abbas’ words rung poignantly true for many of us when he said during his General Assembly address that “in the absence of absolute justice, we decided to adopt the path of relative justice - justice that is possible and could correct part of the grave historical injustice committed against our people.” He was, of course, referencing the Palestinian decision to accept a two-state solution on 22 percent of historical Palestine after the majority of the homeland was lost during the Nakba of 1948.

We did make a major concession by accepting a two-state solution and this is something Abbas has made clear in no uncertain terms. But the Palestinians know that even this is a distant reality at this point, what with Israel’s settlement projects, the separation wall and the hundreds of checkpoints that dissect the State of Palestine in every direction possible. But the leadership still adheres to it, whether or not it believes it can be achieved on the ground.

All in all, the PLO’s move was a good one. It put Palestine – not the PLO, not the PA, not the “Palestinian Territories” – back in the game of international diplomacy with the Palestinians themselves making the first moves. It has been a long time since this has happened and it is a relief for the people that their faith in the leadership’s strength has been restored at least for now.

President Abbas is no hero. But on Friday, September 23, he assumed the title we Palestinians have often been wary of bestowing upon him. He became a leader.

Joharah Baker is Director of the Media and Information Department at the Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH). She can be contacted at mid@miftah.org.

Sunday, September 25, 2011

Paris-based Palestinian composes anthem for homeland: Ahmad Dari... مستني دولة بأيلول. أحمد داري

"Mestani Dawla be Aylol" -- "I Am Waiting for a State in September"


Paris-based Palestinian composes anthem for homeland
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=422029

PARIS (Reuters) -- A Palestinian living in France has come up with what has become an unwitting anthem for his homeland's bid for nationhood at the United Nations meeting later this week.

Ahmed Dari, who until recently worked for the United Nations' Educational, Social and Cultural Organisation, is the author of "Mestani Dawla be Aylol" -- "I Am Waiting for a State in September" -- a hit song that is played from Ramallah to Rafah.

The song, written and performed in a light-hearted, almost tongue-in-cheek manner, has had tens of thousands of views on social networking sites. Dari says it aims to give hope to Palestinians in the run-up to President Mahmoud Abbas' bid to have Palestinian nationhood recognized by the UN's Security Council -- a move that America has vowed to veto.

"There are several major points in this song. I evoke the question of the Palestinian refugees, a crucial question. I talk about the probable American veto at the UN on the recognition of Palestine. I'm also interested in the view of Palestinians, who are split between optimism and pessimism about the future," he told Reuters Television in his small house perched on the outskirts of Paris.

Dari, who has recently become an advisor to the Palestinian Authority, is bemused by the success of the song. Created with his friend, two computers and a handful of instruments, it uses a tortoise to symbolize a slow progress towards statehood.

To create the clip, Ahmed Dari used images from the internet. There is also a woman, a symbol of life.

Dari says the song is much more effective than a political message.

''I felt that my clip reached a very broad Palestinian audience, particularly the young and even the old. The song works better than a political message. The song and the clip are very simple. The words are simple, the music is simple, there are lots of colors in the clip and that works."

His friend and fellow musician Youssef Zayed hopes the Palestinian bid for United Nations recognition will succeed.

''I am optimistic, though I know that there are obstacles. I do not know how long it will take, it will perhaps not be our generation that will see it. That doesn't matter, Palestine will live, we will wait, if God wills it."

Meanwhile, Dari is pursuing his career as a diplomat and singer. He is also an accomplished Arabic calligrapher. He will travel to New York this week and has already composed a new song. Its theme will be the difficult relationship between Palestinians and Israelis.

Dr. Aref Assaf: Whether Palestine... "We have a dream too: a place to call a homeland"


"A banner at a recent pro Palestine demonstration at the UN summed it up: "We have a dream too: a place to call a homeland".

Related: The official Palestinian position on the UN vote bid is contained in a 35-page booklet that was given to every United Nations delegation. Titled "Recognizing Palestine: An Investment in Peace" it lists four reasons the Palestinians have taken this course: acts by Israel that undermine peace, international responsibility toward the Palestinians, the growth of Jewish settlements and intensifying Israeli designs on East Jerusalem. Click here for the link. (It may take a while to download)

Full transcript of President Abbas speech at UN General Assembly http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/full-transcript-of-abbas-speech-at-un-general-assembly-1.386385 According to a recent survey more than 80% of Palestinians support the push for Statehood recognition. http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2011/p41ejoint.html A plurality of Americans (42%) than oppose (26%) the United States recognizing Palestine as an independent nation, while nearly a third (32%) express no opinion. http://people-press.org/2011/09/20/palestinian-statehood-mixed-views-low-visibility/ "

Saturday, September 24, 2011

CNN NEWSROOM 2:08 PM EST September 23, 2011

HUSSEIN IBISH, RESEARCH FELLOW, AMERICAN TASK FORCE ON PALESTINE: "I think we really need to focus now on the day after, and that's two different things.

One is, making sure that aid to the P.A. isn't cut as people in Congress and people in Israel are threatening to do, which could create both a political and a security nightmare for the Israelis and the Palestinians alike, and also protect the achievements of the state and institution-building program, and the security cooperation that has brought law and order to parts of the West Bank that were formerly chaotic.

And to also use the space that's now emerging since the Palestinians are going to make this formal request to Secretary-General Ban, but not push for a vote to try to look for a Quartet statement or an EU initiative or something that can help get us past a difficult period where, because the parties are so far apart, and because we're in an election season in the United States, meaningful negotiations will be difficult to resume in the immediate future.

So focus on the ground, build there, make sure the quality of life is maintained and the security cooperation is maintained, and we can have a soft landing rather than a hard landing. And that's what everybody needs."

Transcript: CNN interview with Hussein Ibish and Jamie Rubin immediately following Netanyahu UN address


Abbas at UN: Palestine is being reborn

President Mahmoud Abbas holds up a copy of the letter that he had just
delivered to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon requesting full UN representation
for a Palestinian state, during his address before the 66th UN General Assembly
at UN headquarters in New York, Sept. 23. (Reuters/Mike Segar)

UNITED NATIONS (Ma'an) -- President Mahmoud Abbas asked the United Nations on Friday to recognize a state for his people, in an impassioned plea for the international community to take on responsibility for ending the six-decade conflict.

"I am here to say, on behalf of the Palestinian people ... We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peacemaking," Abbas told the world body.

"Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of checkpoints."

Addressing the delegates, he said, "Your support for the recognition of the state of Palestine is the greatest contribution to the state of peace in the region. I hope we shall not have to wait for long."

He added: "Loss of hope is the greatest threat to peace; despair is the surest route to extremism."

Abbas handed UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon a letter requesting full UN membership, which the Security Council must consider -- although this may take some time and the US is firmly opposed.

His appeal to the council reflects a loss of faith after 20 years of failed peace talks sponsored by the United States, Israel's main ally, and alarm at relentless Israeli settlement expansion eating into Palestinian land.

It also exposes Washington's dwindling influence in a region shaken by Arab uprisings and shifting alliances that have pushed Israel, for all its military muscle, deeper into isolation.

"Our people will continue their popular, peaceful resistance," Abbas declared.

"This (Israeli settlement) policy will destroy the chances of achieving a two-state solution and ... threatens to undermine the structure of the Palestinian National Authority and even end its existence."

It was the first time Abbas has spoken so starkly of the prospect of the PA's demise, highlighting the predicament faced by a body set up as a state-in-waiting but now seen by its critics as a big municipality, managing the civilian affairs of the main Palestinian cities under Israeli occupation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu followed Abbas to the UN podium and argued that only direct negotiations between the two sides could lead to a Palestinian state.

US President Barack Obama, who told the United Nations a year ago he hoped Palestinians would have a state by now, said on Wednesday he shared frustration at the lack of progress.

But he said only Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, not actions at the United Nations, could bring peace -- despite a long history of fruitless peace talks.

Abbas is resorting to the United Nations even though Israeli and US politicians have threatened financial reprisals that could cripple the PA, which employs 150,000 people.

PLO official Saeb Erekat said the PA could dissolve itself, throwing responsibility for ruling the whole of the West Bank back to Israel as the occupying power.

"We will invite you to become the only authority from the River Jordan to the Mediterranean," he told Israel Radio.

In the West Bank, Palestinians expressed a mix of pride and wary anticipation ahead of their UN claim to statehood.

Flags and portraits of Abbas and his predecessor, the late Yasser Arafat, draped buildings in a central Ramallah square where Palestinians awaited a live broadcast of Abbas' speech.

"This is something we should have done a long time ago," said Khaled Shtayyeh, 42, carrying a Palestinian flag. "It was always stopped by international pressure. I am very proud."

Burden of history

A gulf of mistrust separates Israelis and Palestinians, who each feel their existence is at stake in a bitter struggle over borders, security, refugees and Jerusalem.

Political rifts among Palestinians, and the constraints of US domestic politics, where support for Israel is strong, further complicate efforts to bridge the gaps.

The divisions are rooted in a heavy burden of history, painfully contested narratives and recurring bloodshed.

The United Nations partitioned Palestine in 1947, but Arab states rejected that and declared war on the new state of Israel, which then captured more territory than it had been allotted under the UN plan and dispossessed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, who became refugees.

Two decades after Israel seized the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Middle East war, the Palestine Liberation Organization recognized Israel and reduced its demands to a state on those territories.

A 1993 agreement signed by PLO leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin set out a plan for Palestinian self-rule, which was never fully implemented.

Israel has continued to expand settlements in the West Bank, although it dismantled them in the Gaza Strip, now ruled by Hamas.

Palestinian uprisings erupted in 1987 and 2000, but failed to end Israeli occupation or bring statehood closer.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would continue to push for a durable, negotiated peace.

"Regardless of what happens tomorrow in the United Nations, we remain focused on the day after," she said on Thursday.

Abbas, who has won new popularity at home for his UN plan, accepts that negotiations are still necessary, but argues statehood will put Palestinians on a more equal footing.

Israel sees the initiative at the United Nations as a sinister attempt to shear away its own legitimacy.

Hamas rejected Abbas' statehood bid as unworthy.

"Our Palestinian people do not beg for a state," said Ismail Haniyeh, who heads the Hamas administration in Gaza.

"States are not built upon UN resolutions. States liberate their land and establish their entities."

Diplomats are trying to limit the fallout from the Palestinian statehood application.

The Security Council could delay action on Abbas' request, giving the mediating "Quartet" -- the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations -- more time to craft a declaration that could coax the two sides back to the table.

But the Quartet, whose envoys met again on Friday, has spent months trying to agree on a statement acceptable to the parties.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said the Quartet would await the speeches of Abbas and Netanyahu before setting out "some guidelines, key points and even some red lines."

"It's better to take one or two days more, rather than accelerating and having a weak statement," he said.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has proposed that the General Assembly vote to upgrade the Palestinians to a "non-member state," while reviving direct peace talks.

Israel rebuffed the idea.

"A Palestinian state should be the outcome of negotiations, which means a Palestinian state should mark the end of conflict and cessation of claims," Netanyahu's cabinet secretary, Zvi Hauser, told Israel's Army Radio.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Ban receives Palestinian application for UN membership

Ban sends Palestinian application for UN membership to Security Council

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (left) submits application to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon for Palestine to become a UN Member State

Earlier, in his address (FULL TRANSCRIPT) to the Assembly’s annual general debate, Mr. Abbas said the application for full membership of the UN is on the basis of the so-called 4 June 1967 borders.

“Palestine is being reborn. This is my message,” he said, adding that he hoped it did not have to wait long for the application to be approved.

Mr. Abbas said that Israeli Government policies were responsible “for the continued failure of the successive international attempts to salvage the peace process.”

He cited the construction of settlements in the West Bank, the refusal of permits for Palestinians to build in East Jerusalem, and the extensive number of military checkpoints limiting Palestinian movement and the ongoing blockade of the Gaza Strip as examples of such policies.

“All of these actions taken by Israel in our country are unilateral actions and are not based on any earlier agreements. Indeed, what we witness is a selective application of the agreements aimed at perpetuating the occupation.”

He stressed that over the past two years Palestinian authorities have worked hard to implement a programme of building up State institutions, as well as strengthening civil society, increasing government accountability and promoting the participation of women in public life.

RELEVANT UN RESOLUTIONS
General Assembly
Security Council
Economic and Social Council
Human Rights Council

http://unispal.un.org/unispal.nsf/home.htm

The United Nations has been working on the question of Palestine since the first special session of the General Assembly on 28 April 1947, which established a body to investigate the issue and return with its recommendations. Over 60 years later, the range of the UN's work on the issue has continued to adapt to meet new challenges and address changing realities on the ground.

HISTORY
History of the question of Palestine
The question of Palestine and the United Nations (pdf)
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUE
Key issues in a permanent settlement
Chronology of key events
UN system's response
RESOURCES
UNISPAL library of documents
Map collection
UN events calendar
Facebook

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Palestinian Push for U.N. Membership

Transcript for:
Palestinian Push for U.N. Membership
on NPR's Diane Rehm Show

Ziad Asali: "You have to make progress on both and lead to a resolution, which is a two-state solution, 'cause there are no other solutions. There are many other options, none of which would be a conflict-ending solution. So if the -- if both parties do not find ways to work during the days of quiet and even prosperity, and during the days of conflict, to actually aim and plan to reach to that end, then the whole system will fall apart. I fear this is what's at stake now."

Obama at the UN on Israel-Palestine: Good Politics, Poor Diplomacy - The Atlantic

Hussein Ibish: "But what was missing was virtually any acknowledgment of the Palestinian narrative, except for the right to statehood. He made no mention of the occupation, the settlements, the 1967 borders, the refugees, Jerusalem, or any other aspect of the Palestinian narrative or concerns."

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Obama: "The measure of our success must be whether people can live in sustained freedom, dignity, and security."

"Something is happening in our world. The way things have been is not the way that they will be. The humiliating grip of corruption and tyranny is being pried open. Dictators are on notice. Technology is putting power into the hands of the people. The youth are delivering a powerful rebuke to dictatorship, and rejecting the lie that some races, some peoples, some religions, some ethnicities do not desire democracy. The promise written down on paper -- “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights” -- is closer at hand.

But let us remember: Peace is hard. Peace is hard. Progress can be reversed. Prosperity comes slowly. Societies can split apart. The measure of our success must be whether people can live in sustained freedom, dignity, and security. And the United Nations and its member states must do their part to support those basic aspirations..."

Remarks by President Obama in Address to the United Nations General Assembly